Subject:
|
Re: Just a question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Jun 1999 16:43:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1082 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 00:05:49 GMT, "John Bauman" <jtb86@ptdprolog.net> wrote:
> From the Essential Guide to Vehicles and vessels:
> Walkers were designed to fill the need for a nonrepulsorlift heavy assault
> vehicle
> for armored platoons.While the emipre had countless repulsorlift vehicles,
> drive
> systems could be foiled by gravity fluctuations, unusual planetary magnetic
> fields,
> and other special conditions; the Empire needed a vehicle which could be
> used
> on the terrain of many different worlds.
>
> The finished AT-AT walkers passed Imperial expectations. Almost
> unstoppable
> as a weapons platform,, they proved potent psychological weapons.
Yeah, as long as the opponents don't have any spare rope laying around. Or
wrecking balls to crush the 'armor plate'.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Just a question
|
| (...) There is a really good short story in the book "Tales from the Mos Eisley Cantina" about training a driver for AT-AT's and how to destroy them. (26 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Just a question
|
| From the Essential Guide to Vehicles and vessels: Walkers were designed to fill the need for a nonrepulsorlift heavy assault vehicle for armored platoons.While the emipre had countless repulsorlift vehicles, drive systems could be foiled by gravity (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
