Subject:
|
Re: Just a question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:06:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1117 times
|
| |
|
|
The most plausible explanations I've heard sit much more comfortably
with me than pure psychological impact. For one thing, consider how
heavily armored these AT-AT vehicles are - according to all of the
source material I've run across, nothing short of heavy artillery can
consistently do damage to them. Repulsorlifts cannot effectively
transport such heavy, thick armor at relatively high speeds ~60 km/hr, I
believe). The Main Battle Tanks in Episode I can only go around 30,
IIRC from the Episode I cross-sections book, being the heavily armored
repulsorlift vehicles that they are.
Secondly, the uneven terrain may play a role - presumably, a
repulsorlift vehicle would fly by puching against the ground.
Excessivlely uneven terrain (crags, rocks, etc ...) might screw
everything up, as the repulsorlift vehicle tilts and bows and skids
every which way. Hence, feet, which would also work much better than
wheels.
Last comment: as for their transport capacity - An AT-AT typically
garages 5 speeder bikes (one lance) and carries 40 troops. The
Essential Guide to Vehicle and Vessels mentions that an AT-AT can
instead carry two AT-ST walkers, though I don't buy that. It sounds
like another governemnt contract that falls short of its contract :)
Well, enough ranting. Enjoy, all!
Shaun
sullis3@mit.edu
Mr L F Braun wrote:
>
> Terry K wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:25:15 GMT, D Blomberg <blomberg@netscape.net> wrote:
> >
> > > What I think is even more strange, is why do they model high
> > > tech armored vehicles after bipeds and quadripeds? They have spacecraft
> > > that can take off vertically, hover, and travel at light speed
> > > yet they have Imperial Walkers? Little furry, aboriginal ewoks
> > > can take these things down with vines and logs.
> >
> > Fear and intimidation. An AT-AT would have a great psychological impact.
>
> That's the explanation I've heard too. However, I'm less inclined than
> Lucas and Co. to allow that Snowspeeder cables and vines can bring down AT-ATs
> or AT-STs respectively. The logs, on the other hand, are part of guerilla
> warfare--and anyone who's been involved in street fighting can tell you that
> armor is virtually useless once the lines become fluid, and even more useless
> when infantry support vanishes and you're surrounded by Ewoks (well, OK, the
> veterans won't say *Ewoks*).
>
> ObPeeve: AT-AT as a transport is understandable; however, why is AT-ST an
> "all-terrain scout transport?" What can it transport? It's too small for
> biker scouts.
>
> LFB.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Just a question
|
| (...) In the first part of the movie, Qui-Gon and Jar Jar are 'run over' by a repulsor-lift. So repulsorlifts *can't* work by pushing against the ground (at least, they must have enough smarts to prevent main characters from being crushed). But that (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Just a question
|
| (...) That's the explanation I've heard too. However, I'm less inclined than Lucas and Co. to allow that Snowspeeder cables and vines can bring down AT-ATs or AT-STs respectively. The logs, on the other hand, are part of guerilla warfare--and (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
