To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 15287
15286  |  15288
Subject: 
Re: Comparing Starfighter Speeds
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 21:19:58 GMT
Viewed: 
3688 times
  
Andrew Summersgill wrote:
> 
> > I've found some disturbing stats about relative starfighter speeds:
> > 
> > Classic Movies:
> > A-wing     =  1300 km/h*
> > B-wing     =  900 km/h*
> > X-wing     =  1050 km/h
> > Y-wing     =  800 km/h*
> > TIE Adv    =  1250 km/h*
> > TIE Int.   =  1250 km/h
> > TIE Fighter=  1200 km/h
> > Cloud Car  =  1500 km/h*
> > RBR        =  950 km/h*
> > Snowspeeder=  1000 km/h
> > Incom T-16 =  1175 km/h
> > 
> > Prequels:
> > Naboo N-1  =  1200 km/h*
> > Droid SF   =  1180 km/h
> > Jedi SF    =  1200 km/h
> > 
> > EU:
> > Z95 Hunter =  1150 km/h
> > 
> > 
> >    Umm.. hello? does anyone notice that the three Prequel fighters, • designed
> > and made years before the class movies all go faster than the X-Wing? Even • the
> > z95 headhunter is faster!!  Wasn't the X-Wing supposed to be an amazing • upgrade
> > to everything that came before?  It looks more like a step down! (at least
> > speed wise).
> > 
> >    And uhhh, the Twin Cloud Car can outspeed the A-Wing and the TIE
> > Interceptor? Whaa?  This whimpy little thing has better speed than two of • the
> > most formidible Starfighters?  I can only guess that the Cloud Car is • designed
> > for atmospheric travel, while the A-wing and Tie-Int are for space • fighting,
> > but still.
> > 
> >    Someone please tell me that these figures aren't correct.  They seem so
> > contrary to reason.. ughh
> 
> THAT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!
> 
> This sort of thing is what annoys me about prequels and the like - take
> Enterprise (yeah I know, different franchise) - they've already met
> Klingons, Romulans and have a ship named Enterprise that pre-dates the ship
> we "know" was the FIRST one named Enterprise, but no-one at the studio seems
> to care.  And the Klingons have lumpy forheads but we "know"that in Kirk's
> time - they, erm, didn't.

Ummm... The first Enterprise is most certainly older than anything from
Star Trek...

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Nebula/1424/entrpris/

Click on the "Before World War II" link.

The first space related one went into service in 1976 though it never
made it into space.

Frank



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Comparing Starfighter Speeds
 
(...) I WAS purely referring to this in Star Trek terms. I do have some grounding in the real world! :-) Andrew. (24 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Comparing Starfighter Speeds
 
(...) designed (...) the (...) upgrade (...) the (...) designed (...) fighting, (...) THAT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE! This sort of thing is what annoys me about prequels and the like - take Enterprise (yeah I know, different franchise) - they've already (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars)

14 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR