 | | Re: The word on Lando from SW Celebration II
|
|
(...) I know for a fact that the scene depicted was of Mace Windu jumping in and- ***REALLY BIG SPOILER!!!*** -killing Jango Fett. But they just didn't have, for whatever reason, a darker head so they did the best with what they had. The purple (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Teaser Pic
|
|
(...) Lucky I was reading .space today, or I would have missed this cool starwars model-in-the-making. Keep up the good work Jason. Jeremy (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | ATOC cloning in real life
|
|
Attack of the Clones may become a reality in the furture. (URL) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The word on Lando from SW Celebration II
|
|
(...) Sure in the MOVIE that scene WILL happen but that 'movie instance in time' may or may not be what LEGO made on that display. Yes, you, I and the rest of the world may assume that and it is probbaly true but NOT offically stated that way. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The word on Lando from SW Celebration II
|
|
(...) wouldn't surprise most of us, but then that doesn't really explain WHY they didn't just go ahead and make a yellow Lando unless this same policy made THEM uncomfortable. I'd think most SW LEGO fans would love to see a Lando and Mace Windu even (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | The word on Lando from SW Celebration II
|
|
Interesting tidbit here on the latest word regarding a Lando minifig: (URL) SPOILER WARNING** I also noticed in the Geonosis display what is clearly Mace Windu with a yellow head: (URL) say it is him not just because of the title of the picture but (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Queen?
|
|
I think you're mistaken on what's the cause and effect here. The reason Lego is "geared for boys" is because experienced Lego marketers (or is it marketeers?) realize that boys tend to buy more Legos than girls do. Now this is a generalized (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Strange "Part" in 7163 Republic Gunship
|
|
It's probably for the jedi knight with on extra. However, I wouldn't know, I haven't bought it. Dave (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Strange "Part" in 7163 Republic Gunship
|
|
(...) I got a lot of extra parts too, but not the capes. --Kai (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Queen?
|
|
(...) The inital arugment was that while LEGO states that the lego brick is for ALL KIDS, its really geared more toward BOYS! The Star Wars line in particluar has very little 'girl' stuff. (only 2 girl minifigs). So Tod figured that a Paradise/SW (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Strange "Part" in 7163 Republic Gunship
|
|
(...) Yup, these are in addition to the brown cape for the Jimmy the Jeneric Jedi. His brown cape was loose, while the black ones were in this 42927 "box". I guess I could make him an evil Jedi, since only evil people wear black capes... or not. (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Strange "Part" in 7163 Republic Gunship
|
|
(...) Are these on top of the brown one for Jimmy the Jedi minifig? If so, sounds like you got two really neat extra pieces. Play well Jeremy Scott (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Strange "Part" in 7163 Republic Gunship
|
|
(...) The black capes are for the jedi mini figure. (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Strange "Part" in 7163 Republic Gunship
|
|
Hey all, I just got a 7163 (I rather like it), but was puzzled by the inclusion of an unusual "part". It was a little cardboard box held together by tape that said 42927 on the outside. Inside was two, black capes. Any idea what these are for? I (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Queen?
|
|
"Todd Thuma" <thumat@gactr.uga.edu> wrote in message news:GvrD7L.10n@lugnet.com... (...) Padime (...) devoted to (...) a (...) the (...) where (...) Good lord, she is a hardened politician, leader of an entire planet (excluding Jar Jar's lot but (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Old 2002 product Catalogs in New Star Wars Sets
|
|
(...) You best bet to check out for new sets is here ... (URL) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Queen?
|
|
I am intrigued by the "Padme and Handmaidens" set idea, but what has it to do with Paradisa? Paradisa is about beach settings in white and pink. Now don't get me wrong, Padme with the Paradisa babe face would rock -- it's just that otherwise I don't (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Old 2002 product Catalogs in New Star Wars Sets
|
|
(...) You know, this has bugged me too. Don't know why, maybe I'm expecting a little extra "excitement" in my box of LEGO on top of the bricks - kind of like Cracker Jack's mystery prize. It would be nice to see a 2002 set insert and look inside it (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Old 2002 product Catalogs in New Star Wars Sets
|
|
<snip> (...) LEGO Marketing IMO is always 'out of touch' with reality. Perhaps due to the sucess of the original (1999-2001) star wars sets marketing figured that there is NO need to 'future' market star wars legos. Not sure what their thinking is (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Rebel Blockade Runner . . . Holy Bricks ! !
|
|
(...) --- (...) I've been eyeing this thing for the last coupla weeks, then the shiney SW2 catalog arrived, it even caught my wife's eye. This thing sounds like a brickyard supply. I guess like the Yoda sculp, once assembled would I dare touch a (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
