 | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
If you consider that LEGO uses existing pieces where they can, I can imagine each foot would use one of those tiny "saucer" pieces like the AT-ST foot, or the Millenium Falcon landing gear. Which would be fine, because if it were TOO big, yikes! I'd (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) Is anyone else a member of the Star Wars Fan club? I've written a question to Steve Sansweet about the scales used (actual scales of models) and represented (how big they are supposed to be). "If" I get an answer maybe we could get closer to a (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic C-3P0: My First Impression
|
|
Hi, I think I read in here of someone w/ the same strange problem as me: In my Stormtrooper box was a 3P0!! I called lego to tell them of the mistake. I didn't mind this though, since the S.T. looks like...well....CRAP!! :7) Jono (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
BUT if you go strictly by the fact that the foot of the AT-AT covers the Snowspeeder and take into account the size of the LEGO Snowspeeder. In order to accomplish the AT-AT foot being the right size it would HAVE to be HUGE. This would also support (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Minifig scale!
|
|
(...) Yep. "Average" human heights are very interesting. Go over to Asia, and people are shorter than people living in Europe. I was suprised to find that while up in the northeastern US, I was a bit on the tall side of average (6 feet), but a-way (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Inspired Minifig Scale T-65 X-Wing
|
|
(...) Great model! I saw the pictures on Brickshelf before you posted here - when I saw the thumbnails I thought it *was* the UCS X-wing. When I opened the pics and saw that it was minifig scale, my jaw just dropped. Excellent job! I look forward to (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic C-3P0: My First Impression
|
|
(...) Ok. Here is the list: Technic panel #5: 3 gold, 1 silver Technic panel #6: 4 gold Technic panel #7: 1 gold Technic panel #8: 1 gold ribbed hose, 4 studs long: 3 gold, 1 silver ribbed hose, 7 studs long: 1 gold Flex-system tube, 10 studs long: (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure that the average minifig would be six feet tall. The women should be a bit shorter than the men (they wear shoes with high heels under the dresses, most likely), let's say that their average is 5 and a half feet tall. There are (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) It's certainly been suggested that there are multiple varieties-- I've heard the following things about what various AT-AT designs carry for transport: - 40 troops & 5 speeder bikes - can be outfitted to carry "more" speeder bikes - can store (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
Here's a thought, maybe there are several different sizes of AT-AT based on purpose. A larger 80ft one that contains vehicles and a smaller 50ft version that is a people transport. Just a thought. I know the books say otherwise, but maybe the books (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) A more refined guess: 80' - 96' (...) I checked snowspeeder length a bit more closely. They're about 16 feet long, +/- a foot. So revamp that guess to 60' - 68' (a little over in each case). (...) I still agree with this 60' - 93' measurement, (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) Well I do agree that 50' would just seem too small. The version I made at (URL) Is slightly smaller than minifig scale and according to the stud height, it's over 50'. (And if you look at my picture, don't rag on me about the head, I know it's (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic C-3P0: My First Impression
|
|
(...) Can you provide a list of what parts you do get in the gold/silver color? (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) Forgive me if I sound like I'm ranting about the size of the AT-AT... It's really not all THAT important-- and I'm SURE if we actually measured the models used in the movies, got the distance to camera of the filming of the little luke (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Inspired Minifig Scale T-65 X-Wing
|
|
(...) Thanks Admiral...ahem..."Grand" Admiral Sandlin! Mark Chan P.S. After several weeks, I'm still trying to assemble the parts to replicate your MotoTek Shiva (great model - looks like it belongs in Neo-Tokyo from the movie Akira). I accidently (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Inspired Minifig Scale T-65 X-Wing
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) My thanks to both of you for pointing this out. I found a few pairs on Brickbay. They will come in handy...somewhere (or at least, that's what I keep telling myself to justify all the rest of the lego parts I've collected over the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Technic C-3P0: My First Impression
|
|
Yesterday I saw boxes of 8008, the Technic Stormtrooper, at the nearby TRU. I bought one, and when I opened the box, surpringly I found not a Stormtrooper, but a 8007 C-3P0 inside. No matter. I like C-3P0, too. After I built it, sadly I must say the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Technic C-3PO & Stormtrooper
|
|
(...) I guess I'm going shopping tomorrow!!! Joe (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) Hey All, I don't want to sound rude but why not avoid the "argument" and confusion. I haven't read all of this conversation but according to my blueprints the AT-AT is 15.5 meters equaling 50.8524 feet. Why not just go with 50 feet? Joe (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) <fanatic level=almost_there> Very true. There's a lot to consider :) There are a couple key scenes to derive the AT-AT's actual height. 1. Luke ascending to the underbelly (there's a shot available on www.starwars.com) 2. The foot trampling (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
