Subject:
|
Re: Libertador - Light Penetration Fighter
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Dec 2000 17:40:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1085 times
|
| |
|
|
"Mike Petrucelli" <lordinsanity@usa.net> wrote in message
news:G57K99.B2z@lugnet.com...
> Now my basic stock fighter
> http://www.fortunecity.com/tattooine/sputnik/86/fang.html
> versus an X-wing would go like this. Fang comes to a dead stop. X-wing fires
> at Fang while pilot laughs for an hour at the pretty colors bouncing off his
> ship. Fang pilot gets bored and activates his Xlaxer node defence system. A
> beam fires from the node and the X-wing is incinerated instantly. The pilot
> makes a mental note that he didn't even need his offensive Xlaxer cannons.
> Now picture captial ship defences verses a huge fighter.
That really shows nothing about your strategy/theories on fighter
characteristics. It just boasts about some silly technology (which I at least
don't understand). ;^)
What are you saying, a little fighter with minimal armor of yours can defeat a
larger fighter with more armor and firepower?
I guess what I'm trying to ask is truthfully, what's your point? I'm not trying
to be mean by asking either... its an honest question. I just found your post a
bit silly and besides the discussion. :-)
--
Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org - Centralized LDraw Resources
http://www.zacktron.com - Zacktron Alliance
ICQ: 23951114 - AIM: TimCourtne
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Libertador - Light Penetration Fighter
|
| (...) fires (...) I guess I did fail to illistrate my point. Well for starters I should have explained this. I have used this "technology" since I was 8, though I explain it better now. Xlaxer nodes are similiar in function to Star Trek phasers (...) (24 years ago, 8-Dec-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Libertador - Light Penetration Fighter
|
| (...) Isn't that basicly irrelivent if the capital ship can use its heavy weapons on such a large target? Of course it could be argued that smaller mass means more efficent engines and faster more manuverable fighters. This of course would be more (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.space)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
