Subject:
|
Re: Galactic Shipyard updates and change
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 23:37:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
451 times
|
| |
|
|
"Damraska" <Damraska@Excite.com> wrote in message
news:G3DC6D.5y9@lugnet.com...
> First off, your site has become extremely useful. It now serves as a
great
> portal/gathering point to all the various space sites with featured
> creations. Well done.
Thank you very much.
> I think removing space stations and ground vehicles, at least in the long
> haul, is a mistake. If other people are like me, your site is fast • becoming
> a nav portal to all the various space sites (and a quick way to get up to
> speed on space creations out there). Since space encompasses ground
> vehicles, bases, mecha, and other things, it would be nice to have all of
> those featured through the same portal. In the short haul, I think
> concentrating on one aspect of space (spacecraft proper) is fine. Perfect
> one thing then extrapolate.
I was just talking about the Space Station issue with Rick Kujawa. I
completely agree that there need to be links to stations and ground vehicles
and mecha and what not. The plan is in the end to have those lists/sites
encompassed withen Space World. See my new post above on this.
> You currently have your menu bar in random order (as far as I can tell).
> Some sort of logical structure, based on ship size, hierarchical
> subcatagorization, or alphabetical order would work better. I am unsure • how
> far you plan on going with your current trend toward differentiation and
> expansion so I have no absolute suggestion for this.
Again you addressed something very important. I was actually just going to
ask the group what I should do with the categories. I'm gonna post a message
about this in a sec once I get all my thoughts in order.
> An obvious extension to the Captains Quarter would be similar pages for • ace
> fighter pilots (The Ready Room or whatever) and legendary officers of all
> kinds. Also, somewhere between capital ships and heavy fighters/bombers • are
> corvettes/system defense boats/patrol ships.
This should come about later when we have more room on Space World. I
actually plan on doing this one myself. I'd like to make a subsite with all
sorts of categories of space people/beings like
Captains,Pilots,Villains,Robots, etc..
A lot of the big ships
> featured on your site actually strike me as falling into this
> category--combat spacecraft with a crew of about 50 minifigs or less. (Of
> course, this would make capital ships almost non-existent, so perhaps some
> other criteria would work. Just a thought.)
I'm going to address this one in a second..
>
> Keep up the good work.
Thank you very much for the criticizm. I love input on this!
-Jon
>
> -Doug
>
> ^V^^V^
> I am: Damraska@Excite.com
> Minifig Suns: http://pages.prodigy.net/damraska/
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Galactic Shipyard updates and change
|
| Jon Palmer <jpalmer@oklahoma.net> wrote in message news:G39ow5.M42@lugnet.com... (...) <snip> (...) and (...) me. (...) First off, your site has become extremely useful. It now serves as a great portal/gathering point to all the various space sites (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
