Subject:
|
Re: Galactic Shipyard updates and change
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 2 Nov 2000 23:40:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
625 times
|
| |
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message
news:ie830to8s6gdtm4gtokdjqelkg3ddn595s@4ax.com...
>
> Hmm. At this point, I'd say there are too many categories. I'd back off
> on the differentiation for now. If a category gets too big, you can • always
> split it later.
Yep there won't shouldn't be any more category splits for a while.
>
> BTW, could you switch my Spaceship BR to the 'scientific' group? It's
> definitely not a capital ship. The crew probably won't be more than 20 or
> so.
Well I put it in the Science Category but I really think that thats a
big ship. If crew is the issue well Bardiel will only have a crew around
this size. Actually I don't really consider even the biggest ships on the
site to be true "capital ships". Considering that if you loosely scale up a
stud to a foot then even Bardiel is only 270 feet long. Sounds big but
compare it to:
747 -231 ft
Arleigh Burke class Destroyer -466 ft
John F. Kennedy Air craft Carrier -1052
I personally consider a "capital ship" to be destroyer size or larger. And
my ship is only a little bigger than a 747 in length
We won't go into width problems brought up by a minifig.
My point is that the ships on the site are considered "Capital size" if they
are over 60 studs in length. I think it should be more like 100 but we'll
get into that later.
Anyway.. where did the term "Capital" come from? Anyone know the true
definition of this?
-Jon
>
> Steve
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Galactic Shipyard updates and change
|
| Jon Palmer <jpalmer@oklahoma.net> wrote in message news:G3F8GM.7In@lugnet.com... <snip> (...) a (...) they (...) Well, after an extensive hunt through the bowls of the web, after wading through DoD computers, after discovering one really bad poem (A (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: Galactic Shipyard updates and change
|
| [Snipped previous comments -- I would have had to quote the whole thing.] Originally, you intended GS to be a collection of links to physically large LEGO models of spaceship (at minifig scale). Now, because of the categories, it seems like the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Galactic Shipyard updates and change
|
| (...) Hmm. At this point, I'd say there are too many categories. I'd back off on the differentiation for now. If a category gets too big, you can always split it later. BTW, could you switch my Spaceship BR to the 'scientific' group? It's definitely (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
