| |
In lugnet.space, David Eaton wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Joe Meno wrote:
| |
Cool! Another recommendation would be to make these parallel-view
stereograms - those can viewed through a stereoscope, or by a person who
stares past the art...the eyes need to be parallel.
|
True, it’s usually nice to have both. It’s too bad that you lose so much
detail with most parallel views, though, since most people’s eyes don’t
diverge beyond a certain distance.
| |
Thanks! I’ve been wondering when someone would be doing this!
|
I think Todd did these long ago-- he actually is the one who encouraged me to
do some for my AT-AT. It’s an unadvertised tidbit, but if you look all the
way down the my AT-AT page, you’ll see two sets of images side by side (one
set from the side, one set from the front) that are stereograms (both
parallax rather than parallel tho):
http://www.suave.net/~dave/atat.cgi
DaveE
|
I’ll need to take a look at these tonight - whatis potentially neat about
stereograms is that the scalee can be manipulated by changing the distance
between cameras - the wider the gap the smaller the scale.
i want to see pics done with a minifig sclae gap - wouldn’t it be neat to see a
MOC at their own scale?
Joe
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
