|
In lugnet.space, Joe Meno wrote:
|
Cool! Another recommendation would be to make these parallel-view stereograms
- those can viewed through a stereoscope, or by a person who stares past the
art...the eyes need to be parallel.
|
True, its usually nice to have both. Its too bad that you lose so much detail
with most parallel views, though, since most peoples eyes dont diverge beyond
a certain distance.
|
Thanks! Ive been wondering when someone would be doing this!
|
I think Todd did these long ago-- he actually is the one who encouraged me to do
some for my AT-AT. Its an unadvertised tidbit, but if you look all the way down
the my AT-AT page, youll see two sets of images side by side (one set from the
side, one set from the front) that are stereograms (both parallax rather than
parallel tho):
http://www.suave.net/~dave/atat.cgi
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|