Subject:
|
Re: Official model section at the 'Shipyard?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:19:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
869 times
|
| |
|
|
I don't mean to shoot down your idea too fast here, but...
Isn't this what Fibblesnork does already? There are pics of everything up to
a couple years ago, along with a timeline, etc.
http://www.lugnet.com/fibblesnork/lego/guide/
Most of the largest Official Space sets just barely verge on being as large
as most of the MOCs on the Shipyards... so I don't know if I'd consider them
capital ships. But maybe that's not what you're shooting for in this
instance.
Of course, if you had links to instructions and various places it might be
doing something Fibblesnork doesn't do, which could be valuable... and a lot
of people don't know about Fibblesnork anyway.
Just some thoughts.
~M
--
Mark's Lego Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
> From: "Jon Palmer" <jpalmer@oklahoma.net>
> Organization: None
> Newsgroups: lugnet.space
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 02:01:12 GMT
> Subject: Official model section at the 'Shipyard?
>
> I was thinking about making a section just for official space models.
> Only the BIG ones. A kind of pantheon of sets.
>
> Is this a silly idea? I need some input here. If everyone thinks this
> is weird or that it would be confusing to see these on the same site with
> MOCs please tell me. They would of course have their own area. Only problem
> is I don't have pictures of all of these myself and don't own a scanner.
> Could someone donate a picture of them or tell me where to grab them?
>
> I would have a picture of the set and text saying when it was
> released. For the applicable (out of production) sets I could have a direct
> link to Brick Shelf. Maybe I could also have each set linked to it's theme
> on Lugnet. (like when you go look at 6989 you would find a link to its
> instructions on Brickshelf and a link on Lugnet to the M-tron section.) Here
> are the sets so far that I thought of using:
>
> 497
> 6949
> 6973
> 6975
> 6977
> 6979
> 6980
> 6982
> 6984
> 6985
> 6986
> 6987
> 6989
> 6990
> 6991
>
> If there are others please let me know. The reason I was thinking of
> this is that to me seeing all of the big sets together is very inspiring.
> Its neat to see the evolution of the larger sets through the years.
>
> Anyway I'm just brainstorming right now.
> Tell me what you think!
>
> Jon
> --
> The Galactic Shipyard
> http://www.oklahoma.net/~jpalmer
>
>
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Official model section at the 'Shipyard?
|
| (...) Two comments: 1. What's wrong with duplication of effort? The Fibblesnork LEGO Guide is old and decrepit anyway. 2. The name "Fibblesnork" is the name of (URL) the website. The name of the guide you are referring to is "Fibblesnork LEGO (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: Official model section at the 'Shipyard?
|
| "Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6145F2B.564E%s...ink.com... (...) to (...) have all of the large sets together. Where with these guides you have to do a bit of searching to see all of the big sets. (...) large (...) them (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Official model section at the 'Shipyard?
|
| I was thinking about making a section just for official space models. Only the BIG ones. A kind of pantheon of sets. Is this a silly idea? I need some input here. If everyone thinks this is weird or that it would be confusing to see these on the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.space)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
