Subject:
|
Re: Official model section at the 'Shipyard?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:35:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1230 times
|
| |
|
|
> From: Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com>
>
> 1. What's wrong with duplication of effort? The Fibblesnork LEGO Guide is
> old and decrepit anyway.
I didn't say it was wrong, only redundant. I think TFLG is still a rather
effective resource. I refer to it often.
In any case, my aversion to redundancy stems from working in a corporation
and dealing with the bloat-factor, so please take my opinion on the matter
with a grain of salt. (Maybe more than one)
> 2. The name "Fibblesnork" is the name of http://www.fibblesnork.com/ the
> website. The name of the guide you are referring to is "Fibblesnork LEGO
> Guide."
Do you say "Honey we need some more Kleenex Brand Facial Tissues" or do you
just say "Honey we need some more Kleenex." I don't think there was any
confusion there, since I included a link.
~M
--
Mark's Lego Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Official model section at the 'Shipyard?
|
| (...) Sorry, I took your comment the wrong way. I'm concerned about the general perceived attitude about aversion to redudancy -- one of the things MM was brining up the other day. (...) Probably no confusion, no, but that's actually what I'm afraid (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Official model section at the 'Shipyard?
|
| (...) Two comments: 1. What's wrong with duplication of effort? The Fibblesnork LEGO Guide is old and decrepit anyway. 2. The name "Fibblesnork" is the name of (URL) the website. The name of the guide you are referring to is "Fibblesnork LEGO (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.space)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
