Subject:
|
Re: Sir Bugge's lego page finally gone public! - Space, parts, sculpture and techniques!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:50:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1706 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Damien Guichard wrote:
| |
In lugnet.announce, Niels Bugge wrote:
| |
After a long delay while fighting my father’s webhost to get them to support
statistics on subdomains (since January), here it is with crappy statistics
from nedstat instead. At last!
It’s a page about all the models, I’ve made since the early ‘90ties (and
recorded), mainly space models, and is intended as a recording of my own
development as a builder, as well as inspire others to experiment, learn and
improve their skills.
But time for this kind of things is always scarce, so presently I’ve only
managed to upload around 20 out of currently 50-70 models, and am working on
the tips and tricks section right now, so uploading models doesn’t progress
very fast.
Well, you’ll get tired of listening to me soon enough; so enjoy:
Guess what, I’m making this announcement to get comments so hold nothing
back!
-NB
|
chickwing model is really interesting :)
|
I’m glad you like it since I’m not particularly satisfied with it: I guess that
means that the decision of eventually uploading all my models instead of only my
personal favorites was the right one... something for all. :-)
| |
one problem however is that www.lego.*** site address are not allowed and can
attract you some legal annoyances :(
|
You might be right, but the TLC guidelines seems a little fuzzy on this point (I
read it yesterday, but forgot to syncronize, so this is from memory):
First it
seems like a total banning of lego in URL, but then goes on to something that
sounds like specifying it to the domain (only), so I guess that it should be
interpreted as either
a) very harshly = no lego in neither subdomains, folders
or individual html-pages (that’s what the URL would contain)
or they’re a lot
more nice and b) allows lego everywhere except in the topdomain (= allowed in
subdomains).
Perhaps we should go and ask Jake which interpretation is the right one...
Cheers NB
PS: The answer to JP have sitten in my outbox since friday, so that’s why I only
answered him “yesterday”.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
