Subject:
|
Re: More Module Shapes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Sep 2003 17:07:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
302 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jon Palmer wrote:
> We should have probably addressed this a while ago. Think we should go ahead
> and open up modules to being rectangular or bigger than 96x96?
>
> New sizes could be:
>
> 48x96
> 144x144
>
> Like that. I think as long as they stayed square or rectangular and sides
> were always a multiple of 48 this would be fine.
>
> What do you think?
As long as it's a multiple of 48, anything goes IMO. How is building a 48x96
module different than showing up with 2 modules that you insist on keeping
connected?
The only objection i can think of is the possible lack of the paths between
modules if all the modules end up being huge rectangles. Maybe require the
"road" clearances remain in place so huge detours arent necessary for those poor
short-legged spacemen :)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | More Module Shapes
|
| We should have probably addressed this a while ago. Think we should go ahead and open up modules to being rectangular or bigger than 96x96? New sizes could be: 48x96 144x144 Like that. I think as long as they stayed square or rectangular and sides (...) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
