Subject:
|
Re: .spacers, UNITE! (was: Re: Castle UNITE!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:15:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
865 times
|
| |
|
|
"M. Moolhuysen" <moom@nospam-chello.nl> wrote in message
news:HGruJn.LKG@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.space, Tom Sciortino wrote:
> > While I'm making suggestions, if it's not too much trouble, you may want • to
> > retake the picture of him with the visor down. Lighting may be harder, • but
> > the higher coefficient of EVIL I think would be worth it. >;)
>
> I disagree. Since you are refering to the classic minifig smile in the • opening
> sentence of your description, I believe that a picture showing that smile
> enhances the description more that a picture with the visor down.
>
> With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen.
But... but... ... the Evil!!! What about the Evil???
Okay, point taken, but I also mentioned hiding behind the black visor. So
basicly, I contradicted myself and made it impossible for anyone to make a
decision. My work here is done. ;)
-- Tom
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: .spacers, UNITE! (was: Re: Castle UNITE!)
|
| (...) Not if I make a picture of two of them, one visor up, the other visor down... Description is good, but I'd like others to input on it. If everyone here agrees on the txt, i'll update the website with it. Terry (URL) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: .spacers, UNITE! (was: Re: Castle UNITE!)
|
| (...) I disagree. Since you are refering to the classic minifig smile in the opening sentence of your description, I believe that a picture showing that smile enhances the description more that a picture with the visor down. With friendly greetings, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.space)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
