To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 24670
24669  |  24671
Subject: 
Re: An interesting Sci-fi idea
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:15:02 GMT
Viewed: 
749 times
  
In lugnet.space, Felix Greco wrote:
   In lugnet.space, Leonard Hoffman wrote:

   Well, that’s not necessarily so. Dinosaurs lacked the ability to adapt in the same manner that mammals did. That is what makes humans so powerful, adaptability. Of course, it also limits us. the age old pull between adaptability and instinctual programming. We can learn alot, but it takes time and effort to properly learn, and if that information isn’t learned (like how to forage/cook), then we don’t survive.

I’m not so sure about that. I think humanities one true claim to being anything close to superior are our language skills.

  
And about infinite combinations, I’m not so sure. Yeah, I’m not a biologist or anything, but it seems to me that there can only be so many ways to match up molecules. sure the amount is huge (several billion trillion even), but it’s not infinite. (if there are any genetic biologists out there who’d like to chime in?)

I wouldn’t listen to a biologist. Biologists are dumb. Well, we’re assuming the base of any and all life is DNA, as it is on earth.

More than that, we’re assuming the base of any and all life is molecular. As there are an infinite number of possible molecules, logically there are an infinite number of lifeforms. That also assumes all life is molecular. What about energy based lifeforms, or something we have not yet discovered?

   That may not be the case on another planet. But, I would agree with Joe. Infinite space= infinite possibility.

Exactly.
  
   ps. i like theoretical scientific discussions!

me too!

Agreed.

-Mike Petrucelli





Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: An interesting Sci-fi idea
 
(...) This theory only applies to organic lifeforms (ie, carbon based ones). To expand it into energy based lifeforms, or even non-organic lifeforms requires a philosophical definition of life, which is difficult at best. Either way, they would fall (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: An interesting Sci-fi idea
 
(...) I'm not so sure about that. I think humanities one true claim to being anything close to superior are our language skills. (...) I wouldn't listen to a biologist. (URL) Biologists are dumb>. Well, we're assuming the base of any and all life is (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

24 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR