Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase Corridor 2.0 ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:20:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
809 times
|
| |
|
|
I forgot to mention that I would expect any new corridor designs must
co-exist with previous revisions. IE any moonbase must either
incorporate a 1.0 corridor or have adapters to accomodate them. I
definitely want to be able to connect to all the cool modules you and
others have created : )
-JSM
Adrian Drake wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Tony Alexander writes:
> But what do we do with the dozens of moonbase modules that are already
> built? I'd say that if we want to do a wide corridor standard, we should
> have it set back 2 bricks from the edge, so that if we need a coupler from
> new to old, it can be incorporated into the new designs. For attaching new
> to new, we can either have a standard 4 long corridor coupler that we build
> en masse, or each module would also have a two brick thick coupling ring to
> bring them all together. I kind of like the standard coupler. It would add
> a small sense of commonality among the entire moonbase.
> Adrian
> --
> http://www.brickfrenzy.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Moonbase Corridor 2.0 ?
|
| (...) But what do we do with the dozens of moonbase modules that are already built? I'd say that if we want to do a wide corridor standard, we should have it set back 2 bricks from the edge, so that if we need a coupler from new to old, it can be (...) (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
