Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase Corridor 2.0 ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:27:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
425 times
|
| |
|
|
This might be good for corridors where equipment runs through, but I think
it takes up a lot of real estate for minifig use. Generally, major
transportation devices such as trains and their like would run on the
outside of a module where the number of safety devices, supporting
structures and life support equipment would be reduced or shared with
another system (e.i. the roof). At least in my world....
I seem to recall someone else suggesting a "variance" on the corridore
connection. I believe that the consensus was that it's OK to have a
non-standard corridore connection within your modules so long as there was
at least one standard connection to connect to modules made by other
builders. This ensures interconnectivity throughout the moonbase.
Don't get me wrong. I think your corridor is good - there's nothing wrong
with it. It just won't match up with the other modules without some type of
adapter, which effectively negates the purpose behind the larger corridor.
-Duane
In lugnet.space, Jason S. Mantor writes:
> I was playing around with moonbase ideas, but the
> current standard corridors only allow one MF to walk
> through at a time and aren't big enough for trams or
> monorails : (
>
> I took a stab at a new revision of a moonbase corridor.
> The 4 red floors/ceilings are optional so it allows
> for overhead equipment racks or piping beneath the floor.
> It's all so big enough for monorails or 8-wide trains to
> run through it.
>
> Check out the dat file here :
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/models/?n=1942
>
>
> PLMKWYT,
> -JSM
>
> PS. I'm working on a moonbase rail transport hub.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Moonbase Corridor 2.0 ?
|
| (...) While I agree that right now, most people don't use this corridor idea in their standard, I think it's imoprtant to tell others about it and allow them the opportunity to expand the standard if they wish in their own worlds. If enough adopt (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Moonbase Corridor 2.0 ?
|
| I was playing around with moonbase ideas, but the current standard corridors only allow one MF to walk through at a time and aren't big enough for trams or monorails : ( I took a stab at a new revision of a moonbase corridor. The 4 red (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
