Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase Corridor 2.0 ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 22:03:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
489 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Tony Alexander writes:
> Markham,
> I remember this, and still think it a useful idea. I think the
> concensus at the time was to let the moonbase idea gel a little before
> modifying the original concept, then maybe later consider modifications.
> It's later. I think it's a worthy concept, as I do with Jason's idea.
> I'm going to be looking at incorporating some wider corridor standard, along
> with original connector corridors, into my (still woefully underbuilt)
> moonbase mod.
But what do we do with the dozens of moonbase modules that are already
built? I'd say that if we want to do a wide corridor standard, we should
have it set back 2 bricks from the edge, so that if we need a coupler from
new to old, it can be incorporated into the new designs. For attaching new
to new, we can either have a standard 4 long corridor coupler that we build
en masse, or each module would also have a two brick thick coupling ring to
bring them all together. I kind of like the standard coupler. It would add
a small sense of commonality among the entire moonbase.
This way, we won't have to worry about trying to isolate new modules from
old, and those of us with old modules don't have to try to rebuild.
Adrian
--
http://www.brickfrenzy.com
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Moonbase Corridor 2.0 ?
|
| "Adrian Drake" <tremor@apk.net> wrote in message news:HC82MI.150o@lugnet.com... (...) new (...) build (...) to (...) add (...) connectors would only need to be 1 brick back than usual. A 2-brick wide connector could then be used to connect two (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: Moonbase Corridor 2.0 ?
|
| I forgot to mention that I would expect any new corridor designs must co-exist with previous revisions. IE any moonbase must either incorporate a 1.0 corridor or have adapters to accomodate them. I definitely want to be able to connect to all the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Moonbase Corridor 2.0 ?
|
| Markham, I remember this, and still think it a useful idea. I think the concensus at the time was to let the moonbase idea gel a little before modifying the original concept, then maybe later consider modifications. It's later. I think it's a worthy (...) (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
