 | | Re: Shadowstrike back to front
|
|
"Ralph Hempel" <rhempel@bmts.com> wrote in message news:CAEBIOGHPFFJALB...mts.com... (...) forwards on (...) the (...) Groan..... Yep your right Ralph. I hadn't set it up as anything and now I have it works fine. The others behaved OK straight out (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Shadowstrike back to front
|
|
(...) Hmmmm, I wonder if you have set the type of the Shadowstrike correctly. Check the Spybot type in the Spybot Status display when you first connect it. I'll bet you have it configured as a SnapTrax..... Cheers, Ralph ---...--- Buy "LEGO (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Shadowstrike back to front
|
|
I have three Spybots and I notice that Snaptrax and Gigamesh run forwards on pressing the two upper buttons on the remote (buttons nearest the red button). However Shadowstrike is the reverse of this, upper buttons pressed moves the Spybot (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Spybotics to RCX message
|
|
(...) If you use BricxCC to compile your MindScript code it is very easy to get LASM output. On the Compilers tab of the Preferences dialog just add -TRACE=15 to the Switches field on the LCC page. Also set your include path to C:\Program Files\LEGO (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Spybotics to RCX message
|
|
Ok, I give up. How did you get the LASM output from the Mindscript? I installed the SDK, but didn't find any way to get the LASM output, which is what I'd like to see. (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | 3806 Gigamesh $35 WalMart Bradenton Florida
|
|
Reg $65 on sale $35 USD five boxes #3806 Spybotics at Walmart, SR70 at US301, Bradenton, Florida, USA. Sorry, cannot shop for you. (21 years ago, 20-Jan-03, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | spyutils.nqh
|
|
I have attached to the end of this message the spyutils.nqh file I've been compiling. It's not got a lot in there yet, just the routines defined as "utility" in the Lego Spybotics ROM SDK plus the SendRCXMessage. I'm aiming toward this file being (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Spybotics to RCX message
|
|
Just erased 3 lines of reply now that I've remembered my basic assembly stuff ... boy it's been a while. Yes, that sounds like the right thing to do. Just curious, I haven't installed the Mindstorms SDK since I try to minimize what all I've (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Spybotics to RCX message
|
|
Hey cool, Mark, this is really going to be useful! I've noticed that when MindScript generates a call to the SendRCXMessage subroutine, it always pops the calling parameters off the stack. For example, this MindScript code: SendRCXMessage(5) (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Spybotics to RCX message
|
|
The following NQC code will define a routine to send a message to the RCX or Scout: // Sends an RCX PBMessage to RCX or Scout // nMessage = 1 - 255 __nolist void SendRCXMessage (const int nMessage) { asm { 0xe3, &nMessage }; asm { 0x17, 37 }; } I'm (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Spybots missoins (was Re: Packaging!)
|
|
(...) Mark is correct. I would be happy to begin a Spybotics Mission Trading Area on BimP. I am a fan and would love to see what types of missions could be created by the community. To begin, I think we need to provide mission objectives, mission (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | SpyVLL was released
|
|
Hi, the VLL freaks. I released a programming tool named "SpyVLL", which program the MicroSCOUT via the Spybotics. Neither RIS2.0 nor your own made hardware isn't required. Please refer to the following URL: (URL) ! -- mac (21 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.microscout, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics.vll)
|
| |
| | Spybots missoins (was Re: Packaging!)
|
|
(...) Last week some time I looked there and found pretty much nothing. I raised the issue of creating our own missions and what not and bricksinmypocket.org owner (sorry, I've forgotten your name) has kindly offered space there to trade missions. (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Can't run software
|
|
(...) Thanks again Matthais, I have downloaded and installed this driver. But unfortunately there is no change. Bill Lane (21 years ago, 11-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Spybotics Internals
|
|
(...) Sure...that would be a good reference for the page as well. I'll try and do that next week. Steven (21 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Can't run software
|
|
(...) the (...) led (...) you (...) motherboard (...) here we go: Windows 95, 98 and Me will automatically recognize and load a driver for the Tseng Labs chip sets on all of the Ultimate VGA boards. All of the resolutions and color depths that the (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging!
|
|
(...) Sorry I was off the point I haven't been able to find the original context of this question. I hope there is another way to access them because I don't have enough COM ports to connect to the Spybot and the internet at the same time. If I try (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Can't run software
|
|
(...) The Display Adapter is a Tseng Labs ET4000/W32 PCI. It didn't come with the PC. I had trouble trying to run something a while back. Some research led me to this driver and it solved the problem. I must say I find the whole Display Adapter (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Can't run software
|
|
(...) Thanks for the thought Andy, I definitely have 320 MB of RAM. Yes it is a bit overboard. But when I had a hard drive replaced last year RAM was very cheap so I bought up. Yes, I understand I will have other bottlenecks that will diminish the (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Can't run software
|
|
(...) You mentioned earlier that you had 320MB of RAM. That seems a little high for a Windows 98-era computer and its motherboard. Are you sure you actually have 320MB and not just 32MB, which was standard for many Windows 98 computers? If you have (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
