Subject:
|
RE: global output control
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jun 2000 14:51:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1802 times
|
| |
|
|
> Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> writes:
> >
> > // convenience functions
> > EnableOutput(const int outs); // global on
> > DisableOutput(const int outs); // global off
> > InvertOutput(const int outs); // global reverse
> > RevertOutput(const int outs); // global fwd
Ummm, how about...
ReverseOutput(const int outs); // global reverse
ForwardOutput(const int outs); // global fwd
Reverse kind of implies invert, but I don't think
that will matter to many folks...
Cheers,
Ralph Hempel - P.Eng
--------------------------------------------------------
Check out pbFORTH for LEGO Mindstorms at:
<http://www.hempeldesigngroup.com/lego/pbFORTH>
--------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: rhempel at bmts dot com
--------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: global output control
|
| (...) The problem I have with ForwardOutput() and ReverseOutput() is that the terms 'forward' and 'reverse' already have a meaning - specifically they refer to motor directions... Fwd(OUT_A); Rev(OUT_B); If you then 'reverse' the global direction... (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
