To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqcOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / NQC / 655
654  |  656
Subject: 
Re: global output control
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date: 
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:20:11 GMT
Viewed: 
1848 times
  
mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) writes:

Juergen Stuber <juergen@mpi-sb.mpg.de> wrote:
How about DontInvertOutput?  Not beautiful, but IMHO clearer.

What's wrong with Obvert?

I never heard that word before.

Jürgen

--
Jürgen Stuber <stuber@loria.fr>
http://www.loria.fr/~stuber/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: global output control
 
(...) It's a bit obscure, but a perfectly good word -- the opposite of invert. It means to turn something forward, as opposed to invert, which is to turn something backward. (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: global output control
 
(...) What's wrong with Obvert? (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

12 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR