Subject:
|
Re: global output control
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Sun, 18 Jun 2000 16:31:40 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.ORGstopspammers
|
Viewed:
|
1643 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote:
> EnableOutput(const int outs); // global on
> DisableOutput(const int outs); // global off
> InvertOutput(const int outs); // global reverse
> RevertOutput(const int outs); // global fwd
>
> Any comments? The only name I'm really unhappy with is "RevertOutput".
ObvertOutput?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: global output control
|
| "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8kpub3.v5a.....bu.edu... (...) "RevertOutput". (...) I think RevertOutput is fine. I actually wonder how often that call will end being used in user's programs? The InvertOutput command (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | global output control
|
| The Scout and RCX 2.0 both support what lego calls "global" control of the outputs. At first I thought the global calls somehow took precedence over normal calls, so I simply made global versions of all the output calls in NQC. However, after (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
