Subject:
|
Re: global output control
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:28:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1907 times
|
| |
|
|
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message
news:slrn8kshgc.sof.mattdm@jadzia.bu.edu...
> alex wetmore <alex@phred.org> wrote:
> > > ObvertOutput?
> > I think RevertOutput is fine. I actually wonder how often that call
> > will end being used in user's programs?
>
> The only problem is that "revert" implies that invert must be called • first,
> and I don't think that is the case.
It won't do any good to call Revert without Invert though...
I guess one confusion with Revert is that it wouldn't switch the output
back to normal and turn it on, and the name kind of does imply that.
alex
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
