Subject:
|
Re: global output control
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:05:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1919 times
|
| |
|
|
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message
news:slrn8kpub3.v5a.mattdm@jadzia.bu.edu...
> Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote:
> > EnableOutput(const int outs); // global on
> > DisableOutput(const int outs); // global off
> > InvertOutput(const int outs); // global reverse
> > RevertOutput(const int outs); // global fwd
> >
> > Any comments? The only name I'm really unhappy with is • "RevertOutput".
>
> ObvertOutput?
I think RevertOutput is fine. I actually wonder how often that call
will end being used in user's programs?
The InvertOutput command seems very useful to me. If you swap the power
connectors on your robot then you can just add a few InvertOutput
commands to the program to get it working again. I have always written
macros like:
GOFWD
ROTLEFT
ROTRIGHT
and then have gone and swapped what they have done. Now I can just swap
one thing, which is even easier.
alex
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
