To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqcOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / NQC / 657
656  |  658
Subject: 
Re: global output control
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date: 
Thu, 22 Jun 2000 06:23:31 GMT
Viewed: 
1784 times
  
In article <slrn8l1686.o8k.mattdm@jadzia.bu.edu>, mattdm@mattdm.org
wrote:

Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote:
I just know if I use it, I'll have to add "Is 'obvert' a real word?" to
the NQC FAQ!

That sounds like a reason to use it right there. :)

We must have the same twisted sense of humor since the necessity of
putting it in the FAQ pretty much tipped the scales for me.
ObvertOutput() it is!

Dave

p.s.  We'll see if I'm still laughing when people start e-mailing me
about it.

--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: global output control
 
(...) That sounds like a reason to use it right there. :) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR