 | | Re: Watching Arrays
|
|
(...) The way to do this is to find out the variable number assigned by NQC to your array variable and then watch that variable number plus all the ones up through the size of your array. You can find out the variable number by viewing the code (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Watching Arrays
|
|
I have a program (RCX2 target) that uses a couple of global arrays. I am using BricxCC 3.3 How can I view the contents of the array at run time? "Watch the Brick" shows me Var0 to Var 31 but these don't seem to relate/contain the values I initially (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: swan firmware motor problem
|
|
(...) I have tried it, but it did not make a difference. The motors still won't run. I must admit that I did not think of it before because I thought (maybe wrongly) that the old API would stay the same and that you would have to use the new (...) (18 years ago, 11-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RE: swan firmware motor problem
|
|
I will post latest firmware on web site soon. -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...ugnet.com] On Behalf Of Gustavo Brinck Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 7:27 PM To: lugnet.robotics.rcx....lugnet.com (...) (18 years ago, 11-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: swan firmware motor problem
|
|
(...) I don't have the new firmware, but maybe you can try: #define NORMAL_SPEED 100 because, now the firmware have 100 step of motor pwr control. Best Regards Gustavo (18 years ago, 11-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | swan firmware motor problem
|
|
Hi, I trying out the Swan firmware (Fast0103.lgo) with nqc 3.1 r4 but for some reason the motors won't turn on. Has anybody seen something like that? If I run the program, it does all the other things, even switch on the little motor triangles on (...) (18 years ago, 9-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX remote jammer
|
|
(...) Sorry peoples - the program is working again. Try it out on your unsuspecting friends - watch the channel YOU want to. :) As far as I know, I'm the only one to have figured out how to do this with the RCX, and it's a pretty good joke. Prgm (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Join the Hoodia revolution
|
|
Hoodia 920+ -- The newest and most exciting fat loss product available - As seen on Oprah! (URL) testimonials: "I was originally amazed that the first two pills I took of Hoodia 920+, almost immediately took my cravings away. Now 4 weeks later, 3 (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: IR-based proximity measurement
|
|
(...) You're welcome - it's a fun problem. At least partially because it's one of the few times I've had to worry about the speed of bytecode execution under the standard firmware (see below). (...) Given what you are transmitting and how you are (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: IR-based proximity measurement
|
|
Brian, thanks for your advice. it has told me what is happening physically. i build a one shot measurement program to answer your questions. here is the measurement result: Distance to wall: 26 cm (at night) 7740 7696 7666 7641 7639 7613 7613 7593 (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: IR-based proximity measurement
|
|
(...) Well, there were a couple of typos, but only one I found that was critical. If you are using a "max-picking LIDAR" method, you do *not* want to divide by the number of samples. The variable "eyeon" in your code should end up with the brightest (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: IR-based proximity measurement
|
|
(...) i have downloaded the SerialPing.nqc program hoping to get an easy to use proximity sensor. i have modified it to work with only one light sensor. but it shows always -90 on the display. ok, sometimes -89 too. can anybody tell me, what i did (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX remote jammer
|
|
(...) I haven't actually used the program in a long time, and I'm getting compiler errors now - I think I've updated BricxCC/NQC since then, and I might have to adjust a few things. At any rate, it shouldn't be far from working, so play around with (...) (19 years ago, 17-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | RCX remote jammer
|
|
this is going to be short, b/c I only have a minute. Check out (URL) (after mod) for an NQC program that will allow you to jam almost any IR remote control signal. Direct prgm link: (URL) Instructions: (URL) Enjoy, and please give me feedback (...) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) I've never docked the current toolbars to the side. I wouldn't miss it. (...) I do normally rearrange them (normally to a single row). I'd be annoyed for a few minutes then forget all about it if it was removed :) (...) Personally, I hate the (...) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) There are no functional differences between the planned toolbars and menus aside from the toolbar docking support. The difference is really just in appearance. I have spent the last several months in my real job working on a project to spruce (...) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) John, As other's have elluded to, I am not worried about changes to the IDE environment... I am hooked on this tool, so whatever you come up with, I will work with it.. Dave (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) Me too- what he said, all of it. Mindstorms wouldn't be 1/16 as cool without BricxCC. But I just use it, I don't move stuff around. Tim (Smith) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) Nope. I leave stuff where it is. (...) Nope. I leave stuff where it is. (...) The whole BricxCC environment is the single most important feature making Mindstorms inherently usable for me. Thanks John, for all the work you've put into its (...) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) I never use this. (...) Don't use it. Wouldn't miss it. (...) In any event, I really like BricxCC. Thank you for giving me something easy with which to program my RCXs! (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
