To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqcOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / NQC / 1861
1860  |  1862
Subject: 
Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date: 
Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:44:12 GMT
Viewed: 
8378 times
  
  
   The goal is to make it look more like Outlook 2003 in terms of the menus and toolbars.

Well I don’t use outlook, so I don’t really know what differences there are and what advantages there there may be to switching, can you enlighten me?


There are no functional differences between the planned toolbars and menus aside from the toolbar docking support. The difference is really just in appearance. I have spent the last several months in my real job working on a project to spruce up the look and feel of our very popular workforce management software package and after that I felt like BricxCC could do with a face lift as well. And since I am working on NXT support in BricxCC (a bit of which I hinted at in the screenshots) I thought it would be a good time to make a few cosmetic changes. The updated menu and toolbar painting is simply modelled after the menus and toolbars in Outlook. Hopefully I’ll be able to finish adding the “what’s this” help support while I have BricxCC on the operating table. :-)

John



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
 
(...) No - I never use it. (...) Well I have used that to arrange the toolbars how I prefer, but I've no doubt I could get used to a different configuration fairly quickly, so no major objections there. (...) Well I don't use outlook, so I don't (...) (19 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)

8 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR