 | | Re: New RcxCC revision posted
|
|
(...) Okay, another round of fixes/modifications. Sorry I'm making these changes so fast. I am *really* interested in hearing from anyone who is trying out my revised RcxCC, by the way. :-) Anyway, this version (available from the link above) (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Which way is faster?
|
|
By "fastest", I assume you mean the smallest worst case latency between a condition happening and the RCX responding to it. Option #2 has the drawback that while the RCX is responding to one condition, it won't be looking for the other ones. So the (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Which way is faster?
|
|
I want to know which way is faster: 1. Use three tasks to watch sensors task watch1() { while (true) { if () { .. } } } task watch2() { while (true) { if () { .. } } } task watch3() { while (true) { if () { .. } } } 2. Use one task with multi (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | New RcxCC revision posted
|
|
Anyone who is interested in trying my revised RcxCC can find a copy at: (URL) just uploaded another revision that implements several new features: 1) command line switches: /? or /help = display a help message on startup before continuing /COM=N = (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC for Mac OS X released
|
|
I'm sure there are tons of eager Mac users out there who want to start using OS X, but were afraid they'd have to give up Mindstorms. Well, the wait is over... I added a Mac OS X build of NQC to the releases at (URL) Baum (24 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RE: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
oh, so that's why I got a "bad" zip this time :) ok, no problem, I'll keep using the 1st release (V.3.2) BTW, I'm now using a .bat that looks something like this: @echo off start /w RCX2.reg start rcxcc.exe start /w Cybermaster.reg start rcxcc.exe (...) (24 years ago, 11-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) Okay, I've fixed the zip. Download the latest revision to rcxcc at: (URL) Hansen (24 years ago, 11-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) The best laid plans of mice and men... My computer died while I was uploading to AOL so the ZIP that is there right now is corrupted. I'll try to remedy the situation as quickly as possible. John Hansen (24 years ago, 11-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) I'll email you what I have. I have not enabled Scout support completely in that I have not touched the "fancy" features of RcxCC that let you watch the brick, etc... Some of them may work. Others may not. What I have enabled is the compile, (...) (24 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
Hi, (...) I don't think so. For my version of RcxCC Scout support, I dumped Scount memory map on various conditions.(Thanks to NQC -raw option!!) I will report the inside of Scout sometime. Scout is similar to Cybermaster as John stated, but I think (...) (24 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RE: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
Ah :) That would be great ! It's very usefull for "debuging" Thxs, :) mc. (...) (24 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
John, Yes please mail me your source code so I can add scout support to my program. In the beta version I added syntax highlighting the same way as in RCXCC only programmed in VB. The final version uses a complete new editor with support everything (...) (24 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) Yeah, that went away as soon as I started using the RCX 2.0 locals for variable allocation - the symbolic information just didn't survive the rework. And I completely forgot to put it back in. I'm working on enhancing the listing a bit. I'll (...) (24 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC, Join Forces !
|
|
(...) That's a very good idea, JOIN FORCES (1+1>2) , divide the work and release your source codes, and make RCXcc alomost as popular as LINUX. Maybe sometimes in the future, when I've more time available, I'll join you. (...) Stef Mientki (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) Adding Scout support, if you are relying on Spirit.ocx, is essentially the same as providing Cybermaster support. It was very simple for me to add Scout support to RcxCC. I'll email you my revised RcxCC source code if you'd like. I am not a (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RE: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
I've tested your RcxCC version, and it works great with RCX2 (AFAIK). (ah, and still works simultaneously with CyberMaster too, eheh) That reminds me, one very useful thing for people working with various pBricks simultaneously (like myself), would (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
Hi, I'm Ronald Strijbosch from the Netherlands and I have made a brent new program based om RCXCC, called Visual NQC 2001. The program is still in beta but the final version will be released soon. I think this program is verry interesting for you so (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
Works great! Nice to see the Scout support. (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | New version: MacNQC 2.2.1
|
|
Hi all, I have just uploaded a new version of MacNQC. Version 2.2.1 is a minor release based on 2.2 and only changes the compiler from 2.2r2 to 2.3r1 and fixes a crash on older Power PC machines. Version 2.2 updated the text editor to WASTE 2.0. (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: program wont stop running
|
|
(...) If the person stops running, then that means the program has stopped. The "Run" button stops a program and turns off the motors. However, when a program finished normally (with nothing more to do), the motors are left in whatever state the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
