| |
I've got 2 RCX's and 2 pc's in the same room so will be working with this over
the next couple of weeks. The 2 RCX units work really well, my next step is to
get the PC's to join the party.
My implementation of LNP so far leads me to believe it is a UDP style
connection. To be sure a message reaches a particular host will I need to send
an acknowledge packet or is this buit into one of the functions I have not yet
used?
Michael.
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Martin Cornelius writes:
> Michael Marklew wrote:
> >
> > Woops sorry I was referring to the bit above that
> >
> > > on the sending RCX there is nothing to prepare, just:
> > > // send packet
> > > lnp_integrity_send(packet,length);
> >
> > I think this should be write not send.
>
> of course, Michael !
>
> BTW, if anybody out there does LNP communication involving several RCX's
> and a PC running lnpd, i'd be very interested in unsatisfying results,
> especially regarding congestion -- having only 1 RCX i could never test
> lnpd in such situations.
>
> regards, Martin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LNP Example please
|
| (...) Great, i'd really love doing work like this. If you intend to use lnpd+liblnp on the PC side, i'd be very interested in the results. (...) yes, exactly. The addressing layer gives you connectionless functionality very similar to UDP. A packet (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LNP Example please
|
| (...) of course, Michael ! BTW, if anybody out there does LNP communication involving several RCX's and a PC running lnpd, i'd be very interested in unsatisfying results, especially regarding congestion -- having only 1 RCX i could never test lnpd (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
