| |
Woops sorry I was referring to the bit above that
> on the sending RCX there is nothing to prepare, just:
> // send packet
> lnp_integrity_send(packet,length);
I think this should be write not send.
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Martin Cornelius writes:
> Hi Michael, you wrote:
>
> >
> > that worked like a charm except for the
> > lnp_addressing_write(data,length,dest,srcport) which works as
> > lnp_addressing_send(data,length,dest,srcport)
>
>
> hmm, really strange, in my legOS-distribution the name of the function
> is lnp_addressing_write, there is no function named lnp_addressing_send
> -- where have you got your legOS ?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LNP Example please
|
| (...) of course, Michael ! BTW, if anybody out there does LNP communication involving several RCX's and a PC running lnpd, i'd be very interested in unsatisfying results, especially regarding congestion -- having only 1 RCX i could never test lnpd (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LNP Example please
|
| (...) hmm, really strange, in my legOS-distribution the name of the function is lnp_addressing_write, there is no function named lnp_addressing_send -- where have you got your legOS ? (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
