 | | Re: Possible bug with bss allocation
|
|
"Eddie C. Dost" <ecd@skynet.be> wrote in message news:200007222049.WA...set.net... (...) trivial, (...) In my opinion this is a great idea! :-) Please do the implementation! It also could be very usefull to have some docs / makefile options to make (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) Having fixed the other screwup, I can report that snipping the code I discussed earlier allows everything to build just fine. It doesn't, however, solve the issue with the light sensors. I also tried swapping the two lines I mentioned earlier: (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: semi, sort of, not quite but almost 0.2.4
|
|
Slight problem with lcd.c that would have prevented a clean build has been fixed. Feel free to try again :) Luis (...) fish are jumping and the cotton is high... So hush, little baby, baby don't you cry." -Ella ---...--- (24 years ago, 23-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) It has changed from 0.1.x- Markus (who seems to have just about disappeared off the face of the planet) re-wrote a lot of that. On the other hand, in the actual ds_handler function not much has changed: the only thing that is apparent is that (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | first small error
|
|
The tarball has at least one .orig file in it (a leftover from some patches I applied last night.) Ignore them- they shouldn't affect the build at all, and I'll get them out for later. Luis ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish are (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | semi, sort of, not quite but almost 0.2.4
|
|
Hey, everybody- It's been a while (nearly seven months, actually) since there was a legOS release. Markus did quite a lot of work on it before he dumped it into CVS, and Paolo Massetti and I have put in a little bit of work on it over the past (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible bug with bss allocation
|
|
(...) I have a proposal to the legOS developers: The current tool chain to generate executables for legOS is a little off: We generate coff-h8300 from .c or .S sources, next ld generates symbolsrec relocated files from that. This step is done twice (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible bug with bss allocation
|
|
(...) Thanks for the fix, it works great. Dave Baum (24 years ago, 22-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible bug with bss allocation
|
|
(...) The common section is aligned to 16 bytes by ld. This is unknown to the tools generating the final .lx files. The fix is to force the alignment of the .bss section to 2, with this ld will generate files that work with the current tools. I (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Possible bug with bss allocation
|
|
I was having some random hangs with a legOS program. If I added a little code or subtracted a little, everything started working again. I've isolated it to a problem whereby writing a zero to the last byte of bss data will hang the RCX. This only (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) In active mode, the value you read from the light sensor depends on how you power the sensor and read the A/D converters. In particular, the delay from the time you turn off the power to the sensor to the time you do A/D conversion matters. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | light sensor problem?
|
|
Ok, so i'm supposed to be the guru, but I don't get it: all my light sensors are currently showing a range of adjusted values between 60-310, instead of the 20-110 that I'm used to seeing. The sensor is in active mode (passive mode still shows (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
|
(...) Maybe your reply got sent to the cyber-trash, too. I never saw my post or any replies. (...) Yeah, pretty simple. Hopefully there won't be too many other instances in the kernel, and they're all one-liners to fix. (...) Well, I'll probably (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LugNet links
|
|
(...) I'll take care of it... Luis ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish are jumping and the cotton is high... So hush, little baby, baby don't you cry." -Ella ---...--- (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LugNet links
|
|
(...) If someone could email me a list of URLs, I'll take care of it. --Todd (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
|
I am using egcs version 1.1.2. When I make cross LANGUAGES="c c++", it will run, but then display gcc:cc1 Internal error 7, or something close to that. It is an internal error to the compiler, and the error code genterated in 7. When I compile it (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
|
(...) I saw it. Don't know if others did. I thought I replied? (...) one liners :) (...) That would be nice if true :) (...) It will definitely need some more HOWTO updates. That's quite OK, especially if it means we can "standardize" all the (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
|
Which version of egcs? And what are the errors? Luis (...) ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish are jumping and the cotton is high... So hush, little baby, baby don't you cry." -Ella ---...--- (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
|
Okay. Binutils compiled and installed fine, but when I try to compile egcs, I get many errors, unrelated to any libraries. When I run the failed commands manually (without make), they compile fine. Then I got an error about not having enough virtual (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
|
(...) made (...) Andy (and others), Note that you can now use gcc 2.95.2 to compile legOS - I posted about this yesterday, but it seems to have got lost in the LugNet hiccup. The problem is not with the compiler, but with the options in the in-line (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
