To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / 1237
1236  |  1238
Subject: 
Re: EGCS and GCC
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date: 
Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:44:12 GMT
Viewed: 
4511 times
  
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Luis Villa writes:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > Note that you can now use gcc 2.95.2 to compile legOS - I posted about this
> > yesterday, but it seems to have got lost in the LugNet hiccup.
> 
> I saw it. Don't know if others did. I thought I replied?

Maybe your reply got sent to the cyber-trash, too. I never saw my post or any
replies.

> 
> > The problem is not with the compiler, but with the options in the in-line
> > assembly code. There's a patch at
> > http://members.xoom.com/RoscoHead/legos/memfunc.diff
> 
> OK. I'll look at it- you said it was just a one-liner, right? Oh, OK- two
> one liners :)

Yeah, pretty simple. Hopefully there won't be too many other instances in the
kernel, and they're all one-liners to fix.

> 
> It will definitely need some more HOWTO updates. That's quite OK,
> especially if it means we can "standardize" all the platforms on one
> compiler.
> 
> As far as CVS, do you have any idea how long it'll take you to go through
> everything and fix it up? I think Paolo and I were hoping to do an
> official* 0.2.4 release when he got home from vacation, and it'd be great
> to include these fixes in there- in fact, we'd probably both be willing to
> wait for these patches if they aren't too far off into the future.

Well, I'll probably have e few hours to look at it this weekend. I'll let you
know as soon as I do 8?)

> 
> *official, as in freshmeat announcement and the whole bit. Hopefully,
> coinciding with dropping the "pre" stuff from the HOWTO.


Cool.

Regards,

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: EGCS and GCC
 
(...) I saw it. Don't know if others did. I thought I replied? (...) one liners :) (...) That would be nice if true :) (...) It will definitely need some more HOWTO updates. That's quite OK, especially if it means we can "standardize" all the (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

8 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR