| |
I am downloading the source for egcs 1.1.2 now. I was jsut wondering if it made
any difference if I was compiling this, and binutils, with GCC 2.95. I know
that there are errors in it, but I did not think that this will be a problem.
Just thought I'd ask.
Andy
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
| Shouldn't. That's what my current set of tools was compiled with. When I referred (elsewhere?) to "changes with 2.95," I meant only that 2.95 has a different configuration syntax. Luis (...) ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
| (...) made (...) Andy (and others), Note that you can now use gcc 2.95.2 to compile legOS - I posted about this yesterday, but it seems to have got lost in the LugNet hiccup. The problem is not with the compiler, but with the options in the in-line (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
