Results 2081 – 2100 of 2193.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: RCX as a PGP engine
|
| (...) It really isn't that limited when you consider other platforms that run full PK systems, such as the Dallas Semiconductor iButton. It has a much more limited processors, more limited RAM, and you write your code in Java so it has to be (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|  
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Re: Download problem
|
| I've looked at a couple of traces and it looks like the serial driver just stops receiving data after a certain point. One theory is that something happens (framing error or overflow), which then keeps the driver from relaying more information. I've (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Re: cgywin
|
| it seems make dosn't install by default with the cgywin setup file. i reinstalled cgywin with "make" and other needed modules: ash autoconf automake bash binutils cpio cygwin diff file fileutils findutils flex gcc grep less login make mingw patch (...) (23 years ago, 14-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Sensor Power
|
| ok, I have a real question. I'm interested in sending messages between RCXs using only the sensor ports. I've tested and found by switching between active and passive, signals can be sent, however, when the port is set to active, it is not powered (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | How much RAM is left?
|
| (...) I believe that. 32k of RAM is a luxury for forth. That's another thing people don't generally understand about forth, they way it effectively compresses runtime software. I've heard of ram reductions of a factor of 5-10 for forth when compared (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Possible bug in firm0328 or NQC 2.2
|
| Yesterday evening I was testing some NQC code for an RCX with the new firm0328 installed. A very strange thing happened: motor B was running when motor A was expected to do. I double checked the connections, and the code, and couldn't really (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Re: LegOS forced to use another name?
|
| (...) In the US, at least, a trademark *must* be defended, or the company loses it. If legOS does, in fact, infringe on their trademark, they would have had to defend it pretty quickly or that usage would pass into the public domain. Or something (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | execi and C++
|
| Hi all, sorry if this is a rediculously trivial problem, but I'm having some problems with execi on legos0.2.5 , I can't seem to get g++ to compile when I use it, I pass it a 'correct' function.....like so : int controlThread(int argc, char **argv) (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Re: Remote control under linux
|
| (...) Nice work! Glad to see a native Linux version of this. Quickly scanning your source code (no Linux machine to run it on today!) I notice that you send RCX opcodes in order to emulate the effect of each button on the remote. This is an (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Re: multiple motors
|
| (...) Actually, I think what he's suggesting is a pretty good idea. I usually test most of my sumo robots this way. Place the robot next to a wall. If you don't want to damage a wall with a big, powerful robot, :) use a book held against the floor (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Re: remote control and rcx
|
| (...) The RCX will not respond to the remote until you succeed in downloading the firmware. The built-in romware does not listen to the remote. The remote can be used with many RCXes at once, since it is a one-way protocol with no response messages. (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Re: multiplexor and legOS
|
| (...) Actually, something like this has been documented and done by Pedersen, Christensen, Rasmussen ("Prioritized Interrupts in LegOS"). They actually document the problem of sensor misses related to task management, significantly reducing the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Lego Laser
|
| Using pointers (pun) from a previous post, I have been building a laser for my robots. I used a miniature laser pointer from Sam Goody which was only $10. The hardest part so far was chopping up the pointer to get out the guts. It turned into a (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | Re: fast firmware downloader
|
| (...) Sorry, but I'm going to be stubborn on this one. I abhor short (often cryptic) filenames. In the NQC source tree, almost every class is in its own file, which is of course named after the class. So in a sense, truncating the filenames is more (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
|
| | RE: updating Robolab 2.5
|
| Hello Miles, After all the help you have been to me in the past I am happy to help you. About two months ago I received a CD-ROM from Pitsco with the label 2.5.1 on it. The instructions were very simple "Overlay everything in the current Robolab (...) (22 years ago, 17-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.401)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
