|
 | | Re: Problems with datalog
|
| (...) directly, but that's not possible. A careful examination of the DataLogNext command in the beta SDK documentation shows that the command is quite limited and that you can only log (global) variables, timers, sensor values and the watch/clock. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|  
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| | Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
|
| "Mario Beaulieu" <mariobeaulieu@videotron.ca> writes... (...) Yes. I run pbForth on RCX 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0. No differences. (...) No, to my knowledge. In pbForth the IR port is entirely devoted to communication between the brick and the terminal. (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| | Re: Call for debugging support
|
| Hello Martin, pthreads and select sound fairly portable. And, as I mentioned before, there's a way of having Windows dispatch asynchronous serial events to programs, so work on porting would be fairly localized. The library approach has one serious (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| | Re: legOS-0.1.7 released
|
| I finally got my scheduler working on 0.1.6. Porting it to 0.1.7 wasn't too painful. But when I tested it (I have been testing with demo/tm-and-ir), I found that there is junk (not necessarily alphanumeric characters) displayed on the LCD. Thinking (...) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| | Re: RCX Serial Hardware Hack
|
| Glad to hear it is working--thank you for the update. If I may ask, I have a few questions-- * So if I understand these posts correctly, 4800 baud now works with the IR connection and not just with the hardware hack? *A couple posts from Dick Swan (...) (16 years ago, 24-May-08, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| | RE: RTC
|
| (...) It is really fun ... some of the time ;) (...) Yeah, I kind of thought that IR may not be so good, but I'm sure that I can find some ways around that. (...) That's an idea, although the data acquisition system primarily measures stress, (...) (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| | controlling rcx with remote control
|
| Hello, I'm new to this newsgroup but I need help with an issue... I'd like to control my rcx (with legos) with a tv remote control or likewise. I'm not a happy owner of the standard lego remote control and therefore I can not use the patch from (...) (22 years ago, 3-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| | RE: Displaying info while debugging
|
| Yes, rcxTcl is probably looking at the data coming in on the IR and buffering it until there is a pause. I'll check it out this week and send out an update if I can.... How are you making out otherwise with pbForth? Cheers, Ralph (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
| (...) Anyone know more specifically where to read how Lejos frames standard RCX IR replies? Does Lejos even include any .java code that runs on the PC? I mean to be asking how a PC should frame the standard replies from Lego RCX fimware, not how a (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.890)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.889)
|
|
| | Re: Very strange problems
|
| (...) IIRC, it is 0.1.7, which used a completely different setup for the IR communication. (...) Unfortunately, no. (...) You mean, unmodified? No, I don't think. I've seen lots of code that worked, and then got "simplified" and then stopped (...) (24 years ago, 21-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.889)
|
|
| | Re: Idle Powerdown
|
| Also, Paolo gets credit for the code that resets the idle counter inside IR activity. It will not reset on invalid packets or packets sent to a different RCX unit, so a unit will quietly go to sleep after 15 minutes in the midst of LNP (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.889)
|
|
| | Re: Communication between NQC and VisualBasic
|
| In article <G4uLMp.1tL@lugnet.com>, "Richard Sutherland" <richard@webbox.com> wrote: here...it would just be putting another level of abstraction between the (...) IR Messages are implemented, although in the simulated environment they result in (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.889)
|
|
| | Re: Sensor Power
|
| (...) Take a look at the functions ds_power_on() & ds_power_off() as defined in the dsensor.c kernel file. When you've set the sensor to passive mode, you should be able to manipulate the sensor power bits using these functions[1] or just use the (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.889)
|
|
| | Re: Connecting two RCX's
|
| (...) Actually, the sensors run on 9V too. Why would you not want to use the IR port to get them to cooperate? The "message" system built into them makes this the IDEAL way to communicate, expecially since you won't be tying up a sensor input or a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.889)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.889)
|
|
| | Proximity detections in ROBOLAB?
|
| Proximity detections in ROBOLAB? It is possible to use the IR port on the RCX for proximity detection in NQC but I can'y find a way to do the same in ROBOLAB - is there anyone that has done that? You send messages from the RCX and use the (...) (18 years ago, 7-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.889)
|
