 | | Re: [HOWTO] RCX/MacNCQ/Serial Tower on MacBook Pro (Mac OS X under Intel)
|
|
(...) Excellent! Thanks for testing this. Now I have a reason (excuse?) when I want to upgrade to an Intel-based Ma. Nifty. I'm *guessing* that if it works with a serial/USB converter, it should certainly work with the USB tower. (...) Yes, (...) (18 years ago, 21-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | [HOWTO] RCX/MacNCQ/Serial Tower on MacBook Pro (Mac OS X under Intel)
|
|
Hi, FYI, I've successfully used RCX on a MacBook Pro (Mac OS X/Intel) using : - MacOS X 10.4.6 (URL) MacNQC v4.0b4 (running under rosetta) (URL) LEGO SERIAL Tower (yes, Serial) - Keyspan High Speed USB Serial Adapter (URL) Keyspan USB Serial Adapter (...) (18 years ago, 21-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Microsoft .NET Interface for LEGO Mindstorms
|
|
(...) Well, that certainly (URL) steals my thunder>, doesn't it! "The Microsoft .NET Interface for LEGO MINDSTORMS wraps LEGO's GhostAPI.dll and emulates a real-time controller model." At least that means the work I've done for the Control Lab won't (...) (18 years ago, 20-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX)
|
| |
| | Microsoft .NET Interface for LEGO Mindstorms
|
|
Some news that might be of interest... As part of their announcement that Visual Studio Express will be permanently free MS has released a .NET interface for the RCX. You can find details about it on their Coding4Fun site: (URL) designed for (...) (18 years ago, 20-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx) !
|
| |
| | Mindstorms.NET Request for Comments
|
|
I've been working with José David Parra on the next version of his (URL) RCX.NET> project, because 1.) the NXT system is coming out, and 2.) RCX.NET is basically a .NET wrapper of Spirit.ocx, which means it's not so nice to program with. Another (...) (18 years ago, 17-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.announce, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.scout, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX remote jammer
|
|
(...) I haven't actually used the program in a long time, and I'm getting compiler errors now - I think I've updated BricxCC/NQC since then, and I might have to adjust a few things. At any rate, it shouldn't be far from working, so play around with (...) (18 years ago, 17-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | RCX remote jammer
|
|
this is going to be short, b/c I only have a minute. Check out (URL) (after mod) for an NQC program that will allow you to jam almost any IR remote control signal. Direct prgm link: (URL) Instructions: (URL) Enjoy, and please give me feedback (...) (18 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) I've never docked the current toolbars to the side. I wouldn't miss it. (...) I do normally rearrange them (normally to a single row). I'd be annoyed for a few minutes then forget all about it if it was removed :) (...) Personally, I hate the (...) (18 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) There are no functional differences between the planned toolbars and menus aside from the toolbar docking support. The difference is really just in appearance. I have spent the last several months in my real job working on a project to spruce (...) (18 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) John, As other's have elluded to, I am not worried about changes to the IDE environment... I am hooked on this tool, so whatever you come up with, I will work with it.. Dave (18 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) Me too- what he said, all of it. Mindstorms wouldn't be 1/16 as cool without BricxCC. But I just use it, I don't move stuff around. Tim (Smith) (18 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) Nope. I leave stuff where it is. (...) Nope. I leave stuff where it is. (...) The whole BricxCC environment is the single most important feature making Mindstorms inherently usable for me. Thanks John, for all the work you've put into its (...) (18 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) I never use this. (...) Don't use it. Wouldn't miss it. (...) In any event, I really like BricxCC. Thank you for giving me something easy with which to program my RCXs! (18 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) No - I never use it. (...) Well I have used that to arrange the toolbars how I prefer, but I've no doubt I could get used to a different configuration fairly quickly, so no major objections there. (...) Well I don't use outlook, so I don't (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
I am revising the BricxCC GUI a bit and I would like to get some input from users. Do you care about docking toolbars to the left, right, or bottom of the BricxCC main window? In other words, would it bother you if that feature was removed? What (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LNPd with USB Tower - success?
|
|
Hi, lnpd is a very old program and has several problems, it does not support the protocol used by brickOS, lacks support for the USB tower and may lose packets as soon as they get too large (>8 bytes or so). Collision detection does not work as long (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there?
|
|
(...) Looks like they are definitely not unique - I have a 1.0 number 016642 that is already listed by Mox in NZ. ROSCO (18 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there?
|
|
(...) I have two of them, both marked as RCX 1.0, although only one has a power connector. The powered one is 041020, and the "plain" one is 432865. (18 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there?
|
|
(...) Hoh! That is so cool! I would love to see it graphed. Someone should promote the adding of data to this. I had completely forgotten about it. When I got my first RCX, I remember being required to "register" it at the official website. But I (...) (18 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there?
|
|
(...) It's right here: (URL) I have three entries in the list. (18 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX)
|
