To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / *4745 (-20)
  Re: Wishlist leJOS
 
I (another newbie) also would like to upload data from the RCX to a Windows PC. It looks like adding the data to a StringBuffer would be a good way to save it, but I have not much of a clue about how to write (1) the Java that runs on the PC to (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
 
  Re: Lego Camera and legOS
 
(...) IIRC, the identifier chip is different, so it returns a different ID, otheriwse it is a regular QuickCam. Change the driver so it recognizes the different chip, and it should work (at least this is what it seemed to be on the robotics mailing (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: RcxCC Font problem
 
(...) That worked. Thanks a lot. (...) No problem for me. I only use my font in regular style. Marc Klein Marc Klein A Mindstorms fan. (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: Lego Camera and legOS
 
Hi, There are two versions of the Logitech QuickCam Express which use two different sensors and as far as I know, only one of them is supported by the alpha driver for Linux. I think that the Lego Cam (and your camera, maybe)uses the other sensor... (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  New Version: MacNQC 2.2.3
 
Hi All, I just put up version 2.2.3 of MacNQC. The changes are: * Added a menu to select which program slot the code is to be downloaded into. * Added command in the editor to shift text left or right on tab space. * Fixed a memory corruption (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: Wishlist leJOS
 
(...) I didn't think of that, but it might explain why my attemps to use the OP cods failed (they hung the RCX completely dead). Then again, I might have used them wrong... Björn (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
 
  Re: Lego Camera and legOS
 
Last I checked, the chip which the lego camera uses is unsupported under linux. I wrote up a short discussion of what I knew at the time here: (URL) is even less than I seem to remember knowing but hopefully the link there can be helpful. Luis (...) (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: RcxCC Font problem
 
(...) Thanks! It's been a lot of fun working on it in my spare time lately. I'm glad that a few people have found it worthwhile. (...) I've dug around in the code to try and figure out what is going on here and I think I understand the problem now. (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: Lego Camera and legOS
 
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Kenneth Johansen writes: . (...) AFAIK it is not possible yet. ISTR that the legocam is closely related to the Logitech QuickCam express and the project to develop drivers for the latter (look at (URL) ) will eventually (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: Lego Camera and legOS
 
(...) argg....forgot to start a new thread, hopefully you guys will read it anyways :) kenneth johansen kennethj@stud.cs.uit.no (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Lego Camera and legOS
 
hi all, my supervisor, recently supplied me with a camera that is part of the "vision command" package. unfortunately (and naturally) it only comes with software for windoze. so i was wondering if theres anyone out there that has managed to use this (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Dead IR Tower
 
Well, after months of flaky IR comms between my tower and the RCX, I can finally say that the tower has died. :-( I've forgotten who first suggested it, but using a videocamera to see if the IR led is still functional is brilliant! I confirmed that (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
 
  Re: Wishlist leJOS
 
(...) There still could be some special rom code that is called when the opcode is called for the standard firmware. Not very likely, but still possible. Andy -- See my Visual Interface for leJOS at (URL) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
 
  R: c++
 
Thank you Pat! I should be able to make it go. I'll tell you the results in a couple of weeks, cause I have to finish another project on lnp first. I still don't understand much the unix community: if version 2.5 is to be patched anyway, why not (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: Wishlist leJOS
 
(...) Remember that Lejos is replacement firmware, the OP codes no longer exist as they are part of the standard firmware. Regards Gordon (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
 
  Re: Wishlist leJOS
 
(...) I think that the datalogging area is just a special limited firmware array, but , IIRC, since it mentions nowhere that you have to remember to keep the datalog size into account. Try using the opcodes, and see what works. Andy -- See my Visual (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
 
  Re: Wishlist leJOS
 
(...) It does answer my question, but I was thinking that a feature like that would be more memory efficient. It seems to me (knowing very little of programmimg small devices) that there are special OP codes (looking at Keokea Proudfoot's RCX (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
 
  cvs changes
 
Hi, I checked into the CVS repository some changes today. They include: A) a fix to util/dll-src/Makefile to reference ../../kernel/lnp.c, so a symbolic link or copy is not required. B) small changes to various makefiles to get c++ support working (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: c++
 
Hi, Sorry that I've been AWOL! Attached is a set of patches you can apply to the 2.5 distribution to clean up most of the make process. You will still have to correctly specify the TOOLPREFIX in Makefile.common, or via the make command line. You can (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: Wishlist leJOS
 
There's no need to implement this because Java allows you to create an array and store as much data as you want in it. You have a lot more power by using an array over the NQC feature, which I believe is limited to something like 100 numbers. Hope (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR