 | | Re: VB Upload Problem
|
|
You could always check how big your datalog is by uploading the first point of the datalog in VB. The third element of the first point (point 0) is the size of the datalog. Throw that in a databox and see what it gives you. I would agree that VB (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: memory leak in string handling
|
|
And the problem is solved. Perhaps my pains can be used for something good anyway. Perhaps the people who suggested their beautiful strcat-functions can have (at least the prettiest one) them included in a future release. And if you're wondering how (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memory leak in string handling
|
|
Thank you everyone who helped out. The strcat function works like a charm. Unfortunately, the memory leak is still there. I'm beginning to think it might be that the strings are never deallocated at all. I'm going to have to check so that the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Making LegOS under Win98
|
|
I did not have the lnp.c file, so I copied it to the util/dll-src directory. It did not change anything. Then I downloaded and installed the CVS version. It still gave the same errors. This is exactly what errors were specified: (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: VB Upload Problem
|
|
(...) I think chris is putting some other info in the datalog. I poked at this briefly when using an early version of Robolab 2.0, but I don't recall the exact details. I think it comes from Robolab trying to use the datalog to record multiple (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Making LegOS under Win98
|
|
Hmm. OK, well, if you look in ../Makefile.user (which is included from demo/Makefile) on the very last line you'll see this: %.lx: %.ds1 %.ds2 $(MAKELX) $*.ds1 $*.ds2 $*.lx That is a rule to make all .lx files. So, the rule is there and should be (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: VB Upload Problem
|
|
ok, so i'm getting a little closer to answering my own question, but i'm still stuck. if i write a new robolab program to take 10 points of light data and then upload it with VB, those 10 points get put into slots 10-20 in the datalog, and points (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: VB Upload Problem
|
|
(...) But I wasn't logging variables... and I never have... I was logging sensor values... and the values were certainly not things like 9, 0, 1, 3, ... (what showed up for values) but were more like 16, 23, 32... (which show up 70 or so values into (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Making LegOS under Win98
|
|
Andy- 3 Questions: 1) What version are you running? 2) Where/when did you get the file from? 3) Can I see the Makefile in question? (should be legOS/demo/Makefile, also legOS/Makefile.user) Neither or these have been changed in more than two months (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: VB Upload Problem
|
|
(...) Variables are 'type' 0, but there's a disagreement between NQC and VB about which var is in the log. I haven't heard of any problems with NQC in this respect, but I can test it out a bit and see. ... (...) At the bytecode level, the datalog is (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Making LegOS under Win98
|
|
Hello, I am trying to build LegOS 0.2.4 under Win98, using Paolo Masetti's instructions for cygwin. When I MAKE, it says that there are no rules to compile helloworld.lx needed by all. I looked in the makefile, and could not find a rule. I also (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: VB Upload Problem
|
|
Ok i'm lame. i had the vb uploading code in a random code module instead of a module specifically for the click of the upload button. anyway, now the data comes up in the vb list box, but it is all screwy. for example, for some data that i just (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Mac programmers
|
|
(...) I would LOVE to. Much to my chagrin, I don't have the time. My research project has filled all time left (Behavior Based Robotics, believe it or not!). (...) Oh man, the fun stuff. (...) Figures, now when I can actually add some value to (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Mac programmers
|
|
I'm out here, and I do PP stuff, but I still don't have a RIS. (If that matters!) If it's fun GUI widget work then I wouldn't mind putting some time into it. -Erik (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.2 now in beta
|
|
(...) I'll try to get Linux stuff built this weekend. (We're in the midst of moving, so it might be til Monday.) (24 years ago, 23-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Call for Mac programmers
|
|
MacNQC needs some work - there are numerous enhancements that could be made if I only had a little time to spend on it. However, NQC has grown to take up more and more of my programming time, so MacNQC has largely been neglected. Are there any Mac (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC 2.2 now in beta
|
|
See (URL) for more information. Dave Baum (24 years ago, 23-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) I thought about this for a while, when I was thinking about "obvert". In one sense, "invert" does imply that inversing again will revert (*grin*), but I don't believe that this meaning is implicit. There is another sense which simply means "to (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) The problem I have with ForwardOutput() and ReverseOutput() is that the terms 'forward' and 'reverse' already have a meaning - specifically they refer to motor directions... Fwd(OUT_A); Rev(OUT_B); If you then 'reverse' the global direction... (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RE: global output control
|
|
(...) Ummm, how about... ReverseOutput(const int outs); // global reverse ForwardOutput(const int outs); // global fwd Reverse kind of implies invert, but I don't think that will matter to many folks... Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ---...--- Check (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
