Subject:
|
Re: memory leak in string handling
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:38:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1147 times
|
| |
|
|
Thank you everyone who helped out. The strcat function works like a charm.
Unfortunately, the memory leak is still there. I'm beginning to think it
might be that the strings are never deallocated at all. I'm going to have to
check so that the free-function is working properly when I'm using it. Has
anyone else had any problems with that function?
Torkel
Kekoa Proudfoot <kekoa@pixel.Stanford.EDU> wrote in message
news:FwGLK4.Esy@lugnet.com...
> Jamie Obrien <jamien@interworx.com.au> wrote:
>
> You can't do this:
>
> > char *d2 = *dest;
>
> You probably meant char *d2 = dest; like the original author wrote.
>
> Here also:
>
> > return *dest;
>
> You probably meant return dest; like the original author wrote.
>
> -Kekoa
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: memory leak in string handling
|
| And the problem is solved. Perhaps my pains can be used for something good anyway. Perhaps the people who suggested their beautiful strcat-functions can have (at least the prettiest one) them included in a future release. And if you're wondering how (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: memory leak in string handling
|
| Jamie Obrien <jamien@interworx.com.au> wrote: You can't do this: (...) You probably meant char *d2 = dest; like the original author wrote. Here also: (...) You probably meant return dest; like the original author wrote. -Kekoa (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
