Subject:
|
Re: Increasing the range of the radio signal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.cybermaster
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 22:40:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7974 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.cybermaster, Andy Shaw writes:
> I would second the recommendation for trying different locations for the
> tower. At one point I had so many problems with "dead spots" with my
> exploring rover (that needs to communicate with the map making/route finding
> software running on the PC), that I ended up implement a lost signal
> mechanism to let the rover recover. Then one day when sorting out my work
> room I moved the tower to the top of my bookcase. Suddenly no "dead spots" !
> I played around and basically decided that getting the tower away from the
> PC and monitor was a good thing to do.
I would suspect that antenna placement, and possibly considering a different
antenna design, would make a huge difference. Look in some radio books for
things like Yagi designs. Give you much more range, but also make the antenna
very directional. I use a lot of radio communications for industrial work, and
things that can be 'non obvious', are interference sources, things _behind_
the antenna can have a suprising effect, placement etc.. The actual design of
the antenna has a massive effect, but then you start looking at things beyond
the scope of simple 'movement' :-)
Best Wishes
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Increasing the range of the radio signal
|
| I would second the recommendation for trying different locations for the tower. At one point I had so many problems with "dead spots" with my exploring rover (that needs to communicate with the map making/route finding software running on the PC), (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.cybermaster)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
