Subject:
|
Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:56:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
782 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.robotics, lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Paul Speed) writes:
> You are right that with one stationary light sensor, line
> following is not a trivial matter. Change the constraint and it
> starts to become a little more trivial... we're just splitting the
> problem by focusing on both the mechanical and programming domains.
I am really agreeing with you, but since yesterday I begun thinking a little in
other pathways...
The specifications for a general line following robot have to include also a
specification for the kind of line/pathway the robot can follow. So there are
two different approaches: to decide upon a kind of pathway/environment and
build a robot that will be able to follow it; or to consider the robot hardware
and try to find the 'simplest' pathway/environment it can follow. Of course,
one can do a little of both, also...
But in my opinion, the two approaches are in fact posing different challenges
and I wonder if they should not be treated as different problems too...
Another thought: what do you people mean by "best solution" to the line
following problem? there are many ways to define that, depending of the
environment: decreasing amount of zigzagging; following lines that wind at
hefty angles; handling intersections/several lines; handling bumping into
walls; and even maybe being able to recover after being attacked by the owner's
cat ;-)
As before, each problem has it's own "best solution"...
*s* Am I in a philosophical mood, or what?
/Vlad
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots
|
| (...) You are right that with one stationary light sensor, line following is not a trivial matter. Change the constraint and it starts to become a little more trivial... we're just splitting the problem by focusing on both the mechanical and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
22 Messages in This Thread: ![Line Following by Humans versus Bots -Soh Chio Siong (16-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -Luis Villa (16-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -Soh Chio Siong (16-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -Stefano Franchi (16-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Ralph M. Deal) (16-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -Luis Villa (16-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -Soh Chio Siong (17-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Paul Speed) (17-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -Soh Chio Siong (18-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -Graham Stalker-Wilde (18-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Paul Speed) (18-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -Soh Chio Siong (19-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -Vlad Dumitrescu (16-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Pete Hardie) (16-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Jumping 'bots? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Christian Jacobsen) (17-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Jumping 'bots? -John VanZwieten (18-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Jumping 'bots? -Graham Stalker-Wilde (18-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Jumping 'bots? -Marcus Fischer Mellbin (18-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Jumping 'bots? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (peter renshaw) (18-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Jumping 'bots? -David Paule (19-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Jumping 'bots? -Christopher Lannan (19-Nov-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|