Subject:
|
Re: idea for firmware development
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:44:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
742 times
|
| |
|
|
IMO, pbForth is one of the most ready platform to implement such an emulation
on top of it. Implementation could be easy, compact and quite extensible.
But, do we really need yet another LEGO firmware? ;)
Sergey
In lugnet.robotics, Ralph Hempel writes:
> Jonathan wrote:
>
> > But unless I'm seriously mistaken:
> > 1) pbForth does not emulate the Lego firmware at all
> > 2) the source is not available
> >
> > I love pbForth, but is not what Brian is looking for...
>
> Right. pbForth *replaces* the LEGO firmware, but you get
> a lot of the benefits of user definable functions, lots
> of varaible space etc. without the hassles of setting up
> gcc and LegOS. Great for middle school students and teachers
> who have mastered the LEGO firmware but are not up to running
> LegOS.
>
> The source is available, I just didn't include it in the last
> release so I could figure out a good licence model. Ideas or
> thoughts, anyone?
>
> New improvements (thanks to Sergey Udovenko) include the
> ability to use MARKER in multi-tasking systems, and a really
> cool SREC format system saver.
>
> It lets you compile a pbForth image on the RCX, and then upload
> it to the PC in native SREC form. In fact, you can save the image
> using any terminal program that supports XMODEM (most do).
>
> This really saves time since you can upload an image instead of
> a bunch of text once the application works.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ralph Hempel - P.Eng
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Check out pbFORTH for LEGO Mindstorms at:
> <http://www.hempeldesigngroup.com/lego/pbFORTH>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Reply to: rhempel at bmts dot com
> --------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: idea for firmware development
|
| (...) Well, I think it would be an interesting exercise in programming... The only advantage I can see right now is if the pbForth implementation would be smaller, and thus one would have more space for the applications... but there may be others (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: idea for firmware development
|
| (...) Right. pbForth *replaces* the LEGO firmware, but you get a lot of the benefits of user definable functions, lots of varaible space etc. without the hassles of setting up gcc and LegOS. Great for middle school students and teachers who have (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
