Subject:
|
Re: idea for firmware development
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Nov 1999 16:28:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
669 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Vlad Dumitrescu writes:
> The only advantage I can see right now is if the pbForth implementation would
> be smaller, and thus one would have more space for the applications... but
> there may be others too!
Well, it’s difficult to guess the size right now. But I'm almost sure that
size of the extension itself (without kernel code) will be smaller. ;)
Depending on application, size of Forth code comparable with size of assembler
code. The whole pbForht image is only ~12k!
Beside the size, I think the real advantage of pbForth implementation would be
in extensibility.
Sergey
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: idea for firmware development
|
| (...) :-) I just finished an answer to Ralph on another thread, and it was the same idea that crossed my mind - if the bytecode could be extended, while remaining backward compatible, so that it allows for more variables and maybe a stack, then it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: idea for firmware development
|
| (...) Well, I think it would be an interesting exercise in programming... The only advantage I can see right now is if the pbForth implementation would be smaller, and thus one would have more space for the applications... but there may be others (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
