Subject:
|
Re: idea for firmware development
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 07:38:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
690 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Sergey Udovenko writes:
> The whole pbForht image is only ~12k!
> Beside the size, I think the real advantage of pbForth implementation would be
> in extensibility.
:-) I just finished an answer to Ralph on another thread, and it was the same
idea that crossed my mind - if the bytecode could be extended, while remaining
backward compatible, so that it allows for more variables and maybe a stack,
then it would be a big improvement!
/Vlad
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: idea for firmware development
|
| (...) Well, it’s difficult to guess the size right now. But I'm almost sure that size of the extension itself (without kernel code) will be smaller. ;) Depending on application, size of Forth code comparable with size of assembler code. The whole (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
