Subject:
|
Re: idea for firmware development
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 09:00:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
936 times
|
| |
|
|
Again... Just like in "real" world, we have a legacy system problem here...
;)
Sergey
In lugnet.robotics, Vlad Dumitrescu writes:
> In lugnet.robotics, Sergey Udovenko writes:
> > The whole pbForht image is only ~12k!
> > Beside the size, I think the real advantage of pbForth implementation would • be
> > in extensibility.
>
> :-) I just finished an answer to Ralph on another thread, and it was the same
> idea that crossed my mind - if the bytecode could be extended, while remaining
> backward compatible, so that it allows for more variables and maybe a stack,
> then it would be a big improvement!
>
> /Vlad
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: idea for firmware development
|
| (...) Yeah, don't you just LOVE this kind of problems? :-) And to top it all, one works like a dog and when everything is ready, RCX 2.0 comes and it blows away at least 75% of the work! /Vlad (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: idea for firmware development
|
| (...) :-) I just finished an answer to Ralph on another thread, and it was the same idea that crossed my mind - if the bytecode could be extended, while remaining backward compatible, so that it allows for more variables and maybe a stack, then it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
