Subject:
|
Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Nov 1999 02:29:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
937 times
|
| |
|
|
Paul Speed wrote:
<snip> <snip>
> > I would really like to know who or how was it decided that bots
> > should follow a single line in the first place. Is it just to save
> > on black paint or the number of light sensors?
> The primary motivation is because a hallway is wide and a
> line is narrow. This means that when the 'bot is on a line it has a
> reasonably good idea where it is. Also, in maze following, when it
> reaches an intersection it can see all of its various choices without
> randomly bumping around for five minutes. And even after five minutes
> of randomly bumping around, there might still be one option the 'bot
> missed.
>
> It will certainly be interesting to continue to see the
> various solutions in both areas.
Thanks for the thoughts.
I'm not sure if it's been done before, but I'm now making a playing field where the bot will have to
keep within two black lines using 2 RCX light sensors to see how it compares to conventional line
following. I'll include a T-junction to see how the bot will react in actual practice.
Nothing like trying it out to see if it'll work.
--
C S Soh
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~cssoh
... where air is power
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Line Following by Humans versus Bots
|
| (...) You are right that with one stationary light sensor, line following is not a trivial matter. Change the constraint and it starts to become a little more trivial... we're just splitting the problem by focusing on both the mechanical and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
