To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 7408
7407  |  7409
Subject: 
Re: Flex Cables (Does anyone have the 8485 CCII)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 15 Oct 1999 03:20:16 GMT
Reply-To: 
wattsup1@earthlink.net!spamless!
Viewed: 
2596 times
  
Thanks to Kevin the 8485 Control Center II scans are available and I can finally
build the T-Rex.

I assumed no-one would want to part with these cables, so I found a way to make
my own length of flex cables with 0.065 string trimmer line, making the necked
part at the end with a soldering iron.

My problem is:  The 1:1 length on the scan is of-course not correct and is
scaled.  I tried to measure the printed length of the axles on page 1 and made a
scale factor to lengthen the cable lengths, but it's off by quite a bit.

Does anyone have a 8485 and could give me the accurate lengths of the cables?

Thanks very much, -Phil

Mark Koesel wrote:

> Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote in message
> news:dbaum-1110992125350001@207-229-150-40.d.enteract.com...
> > The reason I speculated that it may have been a legal issue is that
> > several years ago the flex pack was advertised as available from S@H.  For
> > some reason they pulled it from US distribution but kept it in Europe.
> > The flex pack has several different style connectors in it - perhaps one
> > of them is the problem, and TLG works around that in the bigger sets by
> > not using that specific connector.
> > 
> > The other "mystery" is that the "type II" connectors were already in sets
> > (8412, etc) when I ordered 5118 from the UK, but 5118 was still using the
> > type I connectors.  Strange.
> 
> The "type I" connectors were pulled from the market in the US.  There was
> in fact some legal issue -- something about a choking risk.  I forgot where
> I heard this from.  It may have been from a S@H rep.  I believe that they
> also had to stop selling the 8856 Whirlwind Resuce (and other sets that
> used the type I connectors) prematurely in the US because of this.
> 
> If 5118 is _still_ using type I connectors (which btw, are far superior to
> the type II, IMHO), then that is why they are not sold here.  If 5118 is
> not using the type I connectors anymore, then I'd bet they just never
> bothered to reintroduce it is the US.
> 
> > Of course this is all pure speculation.  Perhaps 5118 didn't sell a high
> > enough quantity in the US to remain a service pack and S@H replaced it
> > with something else.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Flex Cables (Does anyone have the 8485 CCII)
 
Can someone post a side by side comparison of Type I and II connectors?? I have the 5118, 8485, 8412, 8437, and they all have the same connector ends. I'm trying to figure out the difference. Phil: I'll try to get you the mm dimensions for the (...) (27 years ago, 15-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: Flex Cables (Does anyone have the 8485 CCII)
 
(...) Happened to be carrying out a parts inventory of my #8485 CC (*not* CCII) which recently arrived from DYA France. Here are the actual measurements of the flex cables - overall lengths followed by the lengths between the notches, in (...) (27 years ago, 16-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Flex Cables (was: Does anyone has the 8479 bar code truck?
 
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote in message news:dbaum-111099212...act.com... (...) The "type I" connectors were pulled from the market in the US. There was in fact some legal issue -- something about a choking risk. I forgot where I (...) (27 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)

14 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR