To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 7408
7407  |  7409
Subject: 
Re: Flex Cables (Does anyone have the 8485 CCII)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 15 Oct 1999 03:20:16 GMT
Reply-To: 
WATTSUP1@EARTHLINK.NETspamcake
Viewed: 
1015 times
  
Thanks to Kevin the 8485 Control Center II scans are available and I can finally
build the T-Rex.

I assumed no-one would want to part with these cables, so I found a way to make
my own length of flex cables with 0.065 string trimmer line, making the necked
part at the end with a soldering iron.

My problem is:  The 1:1 length on the scan is of-course not correct and is
scaled.  I tried to measure the printed length of the axles on page 1 and made a
scale factor to lengthen the cable lengths, but it's off by quite a bit.

Does anyone have a 8485 and could give me the accurate lengths of the cables?

Thanks very much, -Phil

Mark Koesel wrote:

Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote in message
news:dbaum-1110992125350001@207-229-150-40.d.enteract.com...
The reason I speculated that it may have been a legal issue is that
several years ago the flex pack was advertised as available from S@H.  For
some reason they pulled it from US distribution but kept it in Europe.
The flex pack has several different style connectors in it - perhaps one
of them is the problem, and TLG works around that in the bigger sets by
not using that specific connector.

The other "mystery" is that the "type II" connectors were already in sets
(8412, etc) when I ordered 5118 from the UK, but 5118 was still using the
type I connectors.  Strange.

The "type I" connectors were pulled from the market in the US.  There was
in fact some legal issue -- something about a choking risk.  I forgot where
I heard this from.  It may have been from a S@H rep.  I believe that they
also had to stop selling the 8856 Whirlwind Resuce (and other sets that
used the type I connectors) prematurely in the US because of this.

If 5118 is _still_ using type I connectors (which btw, are far superior to
the type II, IMHO), then that is why they are not sold here.  If 5118 is
not using the type I connectors anymore, then I'd bet they just never
bothered to reintroduce it is the US.

Of course this is all pure speculation.  Perhaps 5118 didn't sell a high
enough quantity in the US to remain a service pack and S@H replaced it
with something else.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Flex Cables (Does anyone have the 8485 CCII)
 
Can someone post a side by side comparison of Type I and II connectors?? I have the 5118, 8485, 8412, 8437, and they all have the same connector ends. I'm trying to figure out the difference. Phil: I'll try to get you the mm dimensions for the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: Flex Cables (Does anyone have the 8485 CCII)
 
(...) Happened to be carrying out a parts inventory of my #8485 CC (*not* CCII) which recently arrived from DYA France. Here are the actual measurements of the flex cables - overall lengths followed by the lengths between the notches, in (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Flex Cables (was: Does anyone has the 8479 bar code truck?
 
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote in message news:dbaum-111099212...act.com... (...) The "type I" connectors were pulled from the market in the US. There was in fact some legal issue -- something about a choking risk. I forgot where I (...) (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)

14 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR