Subject:
|
Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:43:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5324 times
|
| |
|
|
Brian Davis wrote:
> > I learned my lesson: simple, simple, simple) either late Saturday
>
> Yeah, but always reach for the sky. After all, innovation is the fun part
> :-). So while simple may always be reliable, there's something to be said for
> complexity when it can make things interesting.
The idea of combining a number of small subunits, each of which work as
desired (high reliability and throughput), can create complexity *with*
reliability. That's the idea I will be unveiling in August.
Bring an extra pair of socks for when your first pair is blown off! :-)
Rafe
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
| (...) In *principle*, this is one reason to have the possibility of "splitter" modules - you could take a 1 bps stream, and subdivide it into two streams with lower rates (0.5 and 0.5 bps, or even things like 0.75 & 0.25 bps, are easy to do (...) (18 years ago, 6-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
