Subject:
|
Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:51:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4091 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
On Thu, June 29, 2006 4:11 pm, Dave Hurley wrote:
> I think the standard is always open for interpretation and revision, but I think
> it's written with enough wiggle room for most situations. I think it would be
> an accomplishment if we were able to get a large majority of people to follow
> it!
This may be where some people get into trouble. The height & placement of the in &
out baskets is a hard requirement. So is the minimum of 1 bps. People MUST follow
the standard, in order for the GBC to work.
Last year at BrickFest, every one of the modules followed the standard. Some
suffered reliability issues, but they still followed the standard.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
| (...) I was wondering the exact same thing. For BF06 planning purposes, I was tentatively planning on having "throughput zones" grouped according to balls per second. The faster modules would be grouped together just as the slower ones would be with (...) (18 years ago, 5-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
| (...) Ahh the lamentations of the GBC slave...I feel your pain. After beginning my primary GBC module a week after BF'05, I am *still* testing it. It is extremely complicated and and I've had to make countless design decisions and tradeoffs. At one (...) (18 years ago, 29-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
43 Messages in This Thread: ![thoughts on gbc module reliability -Rafe Donahue (29-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Steve Hassenplug (29-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Rob Hendrix (29-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Steve Hassenplug (29-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (29-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -David Hurley (29-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -David Hurley (5-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Rafe Donahue (5-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Rafe Donahue (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Jordan Bradford (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (robert hampton) (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (steve) (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![GBC Soccer Balls -Steve Hassenplug (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (steve) (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -John Brost (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -David Hurley (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Steve Hassenplug (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Anders Isaksson (7-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (7-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -David Hurley (7-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Steve Hassenplug (7-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -David Hurley (7-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Steve Hassenplug (7-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (7-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -David Hurley (8-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (7-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (7-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -David Hurley (8-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Russ Nelson) (10-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (10-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (29-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Rafe Donahue (29-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (29-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (steve) (30-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -David Hurley (6-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Philippe Hurbain (30-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Brian Davis (30-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Jordan Bradford (30-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Rafe Donahue (30-Jun-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability -Stump Dunn (5-Jul-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|